MovieChat Forums > Thank You for Smoking (2006) Discussion > Jennifer Connelly should totally have pl...

Jennifer Connelly should totally have played the Katie Holmes role


Very good movie but I didn't think Katie Holmes fit in with the rest of the cast and espcially with Aaron. Heather is supposed to be head explodingly attrative and ultra intelligent but Kate seems neither, her range only includes playing the cute teen she did for eons on Dawson's Creek.

On the other hand Jennifer Connelly could pair up perfectly with Aaron (she's closer to his age for one), making the supposed chemistry more believable. Also she's imo absolutely breathtaking and perfect for the double role of seducing and manipulating Eckhart. Goes without saying no one plays intelligent women like Ms. Connelly or how good an actress she is.

The movie was still great but this part seemed tailormade for Connelly, wouldn't you say?



I'm a Stone Age Romeo got my Space Age Juliet we'll take Guitars to Mars and hit the discotheque

reply


Agreed. Katie Holmes is a tart.

reply

I thought Katie Holmes looked like she was 16

reply

I thought Katie Holmes IS 16.

reply

I agree with you, in fact, I think every character KH has done and will do, should've and should be done by Jennifer Connelly...



*** I take care of the place while the master is away ***

reply

Very good actress, although she's so hot I forget that sometimes...

A squid eating dough in a polyethylene bag is fast and bulbous. Got me?

reply

Is this why they replaced Holmes for Gyllenhaal in The Dark Knight? So they don't relive their so called chemistry.

reply

Chemistry? With Christian Bale you mean? I have yet to see Katie Holmes have chemistry with anything, she's just a name with a cute face and a crooked smile.

Let's look death in the face and say "whatever man" -Hugo

reply

With Eckhart who kinda was in The Dark Knight too ^^

reply

With Eckhart who kinda was in The Dark Knight too ^^


That was Maggie Gyllenhaal, not Katie Holmes.

reply

But you have to have a fly's eye to see it!

reply

The movie was great. Too bad the part of the journalist was spoiled by the unfortunate casting of Holmes . I was actually looking forward to seeing the irresistible reporter with amazing breasts they were talking about, and when Katie appeared, I was like...what the heck?

reply

katie holmes is incapable of playing a WOMAN, let alone a seductress...she needs to learn that acting effectively means that sometimes you change your mannerisms and behaviour - especially if you're normal behaviour/mannerisms are that of a child...

reply

Worst ever casting.


reply

The choice for Holmes wasn't intuitive to me either, but maybe they weren't looking for someone so obvious. There's something to be said for subtlety.

** historyversusthedavincicode.com
** foucaultsvacuum.com

reply

[deleted]

I don't think Katie is a bad actress, but I do think she was miscast for this part. You kinda know what you're gonna get when you cast KH.

Joshua Bevier
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1799124/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42cxlvnFTBM

reply

Neither Jennifer Connelly or Katie Holmes should have been anywhere near this movie...

reply

Katie Holmes was fine in here, you people need to **** off.

reply