Very true- good point! In response to the OP: a bit strange to say that this show was 10 years too late. Trainspotting wasn't a parody of anything - it was very much an examination of the heroin scene in Glasgow in the late 80s/early 90s.
Barley is an examination of the "new media" set which sprang up post-dotcom bubble, so by definition it couldn't be 10 years late because that set didn't exist in 1995. Part of the point which Nathan Barley is making, and which another poster makes above, is that anyone who is able to independently start a costly and loss-making "media node", and waste a few years hemorrhaging cash that way, must be funded somehow - and in Shoreditch, it's most likely the bank of mum and dad which provides that funding.
As others have said, the reality is that this show was far ahead of its time - the whole "hipster" concept has still got some time to run even now, 8 years after Barley was aired. And if you live in the States, you cannot possibly have missed this fact. Take a walk around the trendy areas of any American city and you will find plenty of Barleys walking around, trust me!
reply
share