sickening..somewhat

She's been out of jail this long, no one has killer her. I'm sure she'll go on living. Did you know she has A CHILD OF HER OWN now?

You're awefully brave to defend her, if it was one of your daughter's that was killed, would you still be saying that?

splooch29 have you actually took the time to learn about the case? She was a cold blooded killer the only reason she didn't get life like her husband is because she played the victim and the jury believed that she wouldn't have done any of these things if she wasn't under the influence of her husband. After she was sentenced new evidence came into light and people learned that she was just as evil as her husband.
I haven't actually seen this movie but I've heard from a lot of people that it makes her look like she was innicient and helpless, I really hope that people take the time to learn the real case.

i would commit suicide or let myself be killed before drugging my baby sister for my husband to rape. no amount of abuse could force me to betray my own INNOCENT flesh and blood that way. she is human waste and should be rottng in jail, not procreating new psychos.

[deleted]

when you're beaten to with an inch of your life on a weekly basis.....then try to talk like you know what youre talking about. the survival insticnt will make you do weird things

Nope, that explanation won't do ... first of all she WASN'T beaten within an inch of her life every week ~ she was beaten ONCE ... that's when she left Paul ... the videotapes showed no bruises on her body ... there's the evidence that she WASN'T beaten and secondly, seriously, your baby sister???? You'd have to kill me before I'd let someone touch my kid sister ... It was Karla's idea SHE got the halothane SHE held the rag over Tammy's face (obviously using way too much of the stuff enough to cause a huge burn on Tammy's face and to kill the poor kid ~ it's on tape). She had EVERY opportunity to leave him ~ EVERY DAY ~ she worked outside of the home, for crying out loud! She could have gone to her parents, showed them her bruises and they would've helped her.
She could have let Leslie & Kristen go, too, while Paul was out getting food for them. She is a sick monster not a victim. The movie is complete fiction told from Karla's warped perception of events.

_____________________________
What??!!

[deleted]

i do not know what physical abuse is from a lover, admittedly. i am quite familiar, however, with emotional and verbal abuse.

i also know what it is like to have a little sister.

and i can tell you right *beep* now that if you held a gun to my head and a knife to my throat and said, "drug her so i can rape her" i would spit in your face and tell you to go to hell.

i don't think it is possible to participate in the vicious, depraved rapes and murders karla homolka participated in and walk out of jail 12 years later "normal". there is a seriously disturbed person inside her head and i don't think it's unlikely that someone else could bring that out in her.

she is manipulative and deceitful and helped to end the lives of completely innocent girls with their lives ahead of them.

but yeah. she totally ought to be living in a suburban neighborhood with a new child of her own. that's perfect.

The jurors may have agreed with you originially, as the courts of Canada did at first as well. When the tapes came to light, they were LIVID they gave her immunity. Absolutely LIVID. They were looking for ways to undo it because she's just as SICK And TWISTED as he was. A week after you "accidently" kill your little sister, you're dressing up as her for a sex tape? Now, I don't know about you, but I wouldn't be worried about having sex and dressing up like Tammy because that's what he wanted. I'd have been telling the cops the truth the first time out. And I am a woman that has been raped and battered, you could never get me to do something like that. She's seriously twisted as was noted when she was released after her time being served. That's why the courts set such stringent standards on her before they let her out.

I would have to disagree. She was totally and devistatingly in LOVE with Paul. Anything she did or might have done was totally due to her devotion to Paul She loved him and wanted him to be proud of her. I kinda think she might have been a little scared of him too, the way he beat the crap out of her. This really is nothing new. It's a phenomenon that has happened many times throughout history. There are some serial killers who have had accomplices who had a similiar feeling. Karla is passive. She's no killer. Her sister's death was an accident.Do you honestly think Karla would deliberately KILL her kid sister? Not hardly. It was an accident and it was Paul's fault. The only thing Karla is guilty of is not knowing WHERE to draw the line. She paid 12 years of her life in prison for that, which is plenty, I think. She's not a killer. Paul is and the jury agreed with me too. They gave Paul life in prison WITHOUT PAROLE.

Unless you're restricting your comments to the movie-Karla instead of the real Karla, that's a rather naive perspective on the case apparently based upon nothing but this film which is NOTHING but fictionalised tripe. For one thing, Karla raped one of the girls with a bottle while Paul was out of the house. She was heavily into S&M even before she met Paul. Karla is NOT an innocent bystander. She is a sociopath. She has never expressed any remorse over what she did but considers herself a victim. None of her friends, who knew her well enough to know better, stuck by her. Her cellmates, whom she was more open with, know what a sick puppy she is. Karla even enjoyed her time in prison. Paul was merely a rapist before she came into his life. She facilitated him. And, as others have pointed out, no, the jury absolutely did not agree with you. The jury -- which had to witness a videotape of Karla getting turned on by the drugging and rape of her sister -- did NOT decide how to punish her. The Crown made a deal with her out of desperation (thanks to Paul's lawyer's obstruction of justice) and the judge went with it. I would suggest reading nonfiction accounts about her before making further comment. If you knew the facts, you would know how truly offensive your posts here are.

[deleted]

jonm11100

your a screw head.

Karla CHOSE who to get in a relationship with a psycho....takes one to know one..why would she be with a lunatic??

it's people like you, with that IDIOTIC way of rationale that are the scum of earth...

If I beat the crap out of YOU will you do anything I say???

I live to watch YOU die!!!

Arthur I would have to disagree. She was totally and devistatingly in LOVE with Paul. Anything she did or might have done was totally due to her devotion to Paul She loved him and wanted him to be proud of her. I kinda think she might have been a little scared of him too, the way he beat the crap out of her. This really is nothing new. It's a phenomenon that has happened many times throughout history. There are some serial killers who have had accomplices who had a similiar feeling. Karla is passive. She's no killer. Her sister's death was an accident.Do you honestly think Karla would deliberately KILL her kid sister? Not hardly. It was an accident and it was Paul's fault. The only thing Karla is guilty of is not knowing WHERE to draw the line. She paid 12 years of her life in prison for that, which is plenty, I think. She's not a killer. Paul is and the jury agreed with me too. They gave Paul life in prison WITHOUT PAROLE. Leigh Allen

HAVE YOU EVEN READ UP ON THE ACTUAL CASE AND ALL THE FACTS? KARLA IS PASSIVE??
SHE HELPED KILL HER OWN SISTER, FOR LOVE?? PURE B.S.. WHAT'S REALLY DISTURBING TO ME IS THE SYMPATHY YOUR GIVING THIS SICK INDIVIDUAL. THE THINGS SHE AND HER EX-HUSBAND DID WERE PURE EVIL, SHE SHOULD STILL BE ROTTING IN PRSION. GOD KNOWS WHATS GOING TO BECOME OF HER CHILD. IN MY OPINION ONCE SOMEONE HAS BEEN CONVICTED OF A SEX CRIME, ESPECIALLY TO THE DEGREE OF HERS, THEY SHOULD NEVER
BE ABLE TO HAVE CHILDREN.

[deleted]

I remember reading when I was a kid about the things they found on the tapes..discusting things that she did with body parts (masterbation) was a key word. They had this on tape...now no offence but deal or no deal this is grounds for way more than what she got. I know and understand that Paul was the mastermind but having been in an extremely abusive situation no matter what he did to me there is no way I would have allowed him to force me to do anything remotely close to what she did.
I don't care how badly you were beaten into submission, morals still survive and the things that were done to holmolka's sister and the other two girls were disgusting and beyond words. How anyone can get off by simply saying "he made me do it" is the most disgusting example of our justice system.
As for dear old Paul...the sick*beep* gen pop works for me then us tax payers don't need to pay for that thing to go on breathing,,, I still agree with an eye for an eye maybe he should experience what he did to all those girls, only this time on the receiving end.
I appologise if I have offended anyone with my statement but this is my opinion, and wether it is agreeable or not it is still mine to voice.

We have maybe half a dozen memorable cases of flawed justice in the history of the entire country.... I think that our criminal justice system is pretty good.

---
You're making me--- you're making my stomach sick.