Haha, what's with the child's penis
Wasn't expecting that, totally gross :-o
________
Armchair Critic Law 38:
If a film has a plot twist, over analyse.
Wasn't expecting that, totally gross :-o
________
Armchair Critic Law 38:
If a film has a plot twist, over analyse.
I really liked the movie but I thought that bit was stupid. There was no need to show the penis. Leave something to the imagination
shareI think I saw an edited version, cuz I dont know what this is about....
what scene are you referencing?
It was pretty crucial to the film so is an odd cut to make. Tristam gets his penis (visibly) caught in the sash window because his uncle has used bits of it for his model of the battle field. It's when Steve Coogan as older Tristram is talking to the first child actor playing his younger self. They argue about which of them acts the pain the best. At the start of the film he says that the cock in the title is his, shortly before cutting to the scene. It's also what makes the hot chestnut scene so funny.
"I'm entitled. Simple. End of.."
Why do you have a problem with viewing a penis?
If it makes you uncomfortable then maybe you should join the preasthood or become a nun.
Or a eunuch.
"That sound you hear, is stunned silence."
nudity is never inappropriate--its just nudity--if youre a pedophile,kids turn you on whether theyre naked or not..if youre not a pedophile,nudity should not get you all riled up...stop the posturing
shareIf the nudity isn't used in a sexual context, then, I guess it's just nudity and nothing to worry about.
shareRemember folks, Americans' are God-fearin' people! I'm sure "Thou shalt not show a child's junk on celuloid!" was a commandmant or some such nonsense. I may be mistaken, my biblical is a bit rusty.
With your feet on the air and your head on the ground, try this sig with spinach, yeah!
Sounds about right, though.
share[deleted]
[deleted]