MovieChat Forums > Crutch (2004) Discussion > Not what it could have been, largely due...

Not what it could have been, largely due to self-absorption


Had Moretti's obvious need to dramatize his own life been so transparent from the very opening of this film's credits we might have been treated to a semi-interesting film with some decent acting. That he was more concerned with getting it made, at the expense of putting together a good, solid, film - than with assembling a talented crew of actors with a bit of experience & talent, is both sad & off-putting. One glance at the filmographies of any of the cast will show you that they have little or no previous experience & that, after this film came out, they weren't given too many other jobs (with good reason). I think Moretti might have done a bit better if he'd just settled for publishing an angst-ridden memoir than attempting to make 'high' art out of what is, essentially, a script that is both too self-important and too amateurish to be credible in many places. It is painful to watch at times, not because of the subject matter but because the acting is so horrible & over the top. It might have done better as a play, with a little fine-tuning - but it doesn't translate onto the screen with anything resembling credibility or subtlety, much less inspired drama. If you want to read a diary - read a diary - if you want to SEE a diary, see this film. Hopefully Moretti will keep the faith but will factor in the need for talent & a good editor next time; i'm sure he has it in him to write a good screenplay - but he didn't do it this time out.

reply

Omg I agree with what you said. The acting was so bad and it made me embarrassed for the characters and the actors when i was watching the movie


...There were many awkard parts in the movie, and not from the situations of the movies, but from the delievery of the lines by the actors and the timing of the actors.....

reply