The apologists for the Taliban should try informing themselves. First, there is really no controversy as to the nature of the Taliban - they are a group of religious fanatics who insist upon very rigid adherence to the rules of Islam (naturally, as they interpret them), which means in essense men can be killed for not having a beard, women for not covering themselves, anyone for playing music or adopting any western customs. Yes, they executed thousands, they destroyed priceless works of art (which they believe are against Allah's law). I could go on, but it is pointless. Such a group has no conception of modern, post-enlightenment government and society, as we have in the West, where we take for granted our freedoms (including religious), human rights, and protection of our lives from arbitrary deprivation. Fanatics convinced they are empowered by God to enforce sacred rules can be very brutal to those whom they consider to be violating God's law. Further, fanaticism and the actual position of absolute power over so many dements the human character, causing such people to loose all restraint and also to start viewing their opponents as not worthy humans, thus not deserving of basic respect and dignity, hence you can kill them. As Assef says in the book, he views Afghanistan as a great mansion cluttered with garbage, and the Taliban is taking the garbage out. No this portrayal of the Taliban is not exaggerated, not does it have an agenda in my view. By the way, the book was published long after the US invasion of Afghanistan, so it could not (much less the film) been motivated by the desire to justify the invasion (which, in any case, WAS justified).
reply
share