People saying this is porn they obviously don't watch much porn
As for me a porn movie is that showing clearly penetration and fellatio, which you can't see in here. Holding a penis in her hand is seen but why that is porn? What happens then when in other movies with less sexual content the guy rubs his hand over her breasts and nobody thing is pornography? I mean, there is a clear discrimination about women showing their naked bodies frequently in any genre of films and men rarely appearing completely nude.
In addition, if we talk about the plot and how the story is brought to the viewer, anyone with a bit of brain can tell that is more about romanticism and eroticism rather than roughness or obscenity. I've particularly watched many movies within other genres (thrillers, horror, action...) with maybe less skin showing but with a more shocking and disturbing sexual content like for example simulating strongly violent rapes or sexual relationships involving physical violence and incestuous intercourses.
Otherwise, this movie have many positive things. The fact that for once a woman has a more active and dominant role in a sexual setting and is not just the man's toy. The way the actress is portrayed as an equal being, with the same needs, desire and urge for sex as men have. I really liked the two main actors as although beautiful and sexy, didn't seem taken from a playboy's cover. I mean, Lauren Lee Smith didn't have exuberant breasts, big butt and a fake Barbie face full of make-up and long extensions. Eric Balfour even having a great body I think has a very charismatic face and his other parts which have raised much polemic are not that unrealistic and enormous thing you see in XXX.
So in conclusion, if you still think that this movie is like porn, you might need to go and search for some XXX sites and compare before talking.