MovieChat Forums > Junebug (2005) Discussion > What is the point of this movie??

What is the point of this movie??


I don't mean to be rude but my family and my grandmother all watched this movie and we saw absolutely no point and we did not feel that it was even entertaining. My father went to film school and he did not see any theme or point to this movie.

SO can you help me to understand?

McKitty ROCKS!!
Addisexer # 13

reply

[deleted]

"My father went to film school and he did not see any theme or point to this movie."

BS. What, he was sick during the course on character studies? He's never seen Eraserhead? Come on, please... "film school"?

http://us.imdb.com/name/nm2339870/

reply

I know this doesn't answer your question but perhaps your father should get his money back from that school.

theme(s)
alienation in families
culture clash
marriage of convenience (pregnancy)
marriages of passion (george & madelaine)
"you can't go home again" - regret


I could go on & on and I didn't even go to film school.

*SPOILERS BELOW*!!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusory_superiority

reply

I was asking myself the same questions. I was tempted to just turn off the DVD but I gave it its due. The only positive aspect was the love between George and Madeline. The best part was when they left town.

I wish someone had slapped the living *beep* out of Johnny. What a useless and despicable person.

I am grateful it was only 105 minutes long.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

George left his family for three years.

The point of the movie is that no one is "right" or "wrong" -- George is slightly ashamed/embarrassed about his country past because he thinks they are "wrong" or slightly "backward" compared to Madeline. What Ashley and Madeline teach everyone, though, is that meeting new people should be more of an adventure than a chance to denigrate someone's upbringing/life.

reply

[deleted]

OMG I totally get it now! Before, I was just like, what is the point of this AWFUL movie? But now I get it...

BUT!

If he left town for 3 years, how did he knock up Ashley?

And why didn't they play into that more?

You couldn't tell.

Hm...

reply

Ashley and Johnny were married and having a baby. George did not knock up Ashley. George is the older brother who returns with his wife to let her check out the local artist she wants to represent.
Ashley and Johnny remain in their small country town, whereas George left for years and never visited his family.

reply

George is the one who left town for 3 years - but he's not the one who knocked up Ashley - the other brother did that - Johnny. George is the brother that left town and met and married Madeleine..... :-)
I'm glad I read this thread. It gave me some good insight too. Thanks everyone!

reply

How???? He wasn't in his hometown for at least three years!

reply

[deleted]

There are two main themes that over ride all.
1. You can't go home again.
2. No man is an island unto himself.

1. Once yu leave home, get a life with new friends, wife, etc that changes yu. Going home to be the son you were is impossible. Visits can be agony for all. George was the piece that no longer fit. By making another visit tho, the next time will be easier because everyone knows what to expect and can fake it.

2. We are not alone in life at all. George is still part of this family. What he does OR does not do affects them, even as to who he marries. He can't escape the past. He is still the George that grew up in that house but he is also a different George and that changes THEM.

By changing his present, George changed his future and who knows, maybe he changed Johnny a little bit too just by going home.

Yes them leaving for Chicago was a relief to us and them. But bittersweet too.
For them some real soul searching and values was gonna have to be examined.
No longer do they live in their little bubble, they have brought George's family into their world.

reply

I don't know that Johnny is useless. He was frustrated and depressed but he was "himself", as opposed to George who seemed to be split a little. We know George loves his wife when he tries to tape the Meerkat show for her, but the way in which he did it was immature. Johnny is a different person at work, doing his job, laughing with co-workers and smiling, so we know that his unhappiness comes from his home life, and that he's not ready for a baby. We also know he told his wife, for two years mind you, than he didn't want a baby, but she became pregnant and likely due to their religious beliefs and her desire for a baby they were going to continue the pregnancy. The part at the end of the movie where Johnny tells his wife, over the phone to her when she's at the hospital, that maybe later in life they can try for a baby again, is the tip that he, again, loves his wife, wants a family with her but isn't ready now and but will try to be later. He does this to make her happy.

reply

What I got from it is that if you're going to meet your own extended family, then it's not wise to be detached and observe events from a distance; you have to make an effort and try to fit in the whole time that you're there. If you don't do that, and you stay aloof, then they'll forever be distrustful of you and question your motives... Madeleine was quite patronising to that artist guy to get what she wanted, but it didn't work on her inlaws, because despite living a different life to her, they picked up on her insincerity straight away... They either knew she was different to them, or like Ashley, didn't care.

Accepting family members isn't a choice, you're thrust into that situation, and it makes sense to try and adapt to it for the whole time that you're sharing someone else's company.






"I've been turned down more times than the beds at the Holiday Inn; I still try"

reply

learn their correct names too.



Where there's smoke, there's barbecue!

reply

I'm not sure there is a point (or points). Here are excerpts from a few reviews that rang true to me:

"A simple country mouse-city mouse tale and given it cosmic implications. It is the story of everyone who grew up in the boonies and then gone on to make it big in the big city. It beautifully portrays the embarrassment you feel about taking a worldly spouse back to your small hometown and its pettiness; the small-mindedness and envy of the siblings who never left town or made good; the reinvention of one's self when one moves to a big metropolis like Chicago. I did NOT feel the Bible Belt North Carolinians were stereotyped, as some viewers have remarked; I felt they were all portrayed as real people who simply had a tough time articulating their feelings, and who were just SIMPLE people...church-goers, family people who have no complexity of emotions or doubts, like city people are wont to have."

"Rather than spelling out exactly what we're supposed to be thinking and feeling at every moment, the filmmakers respect the audience's ability to infer meaning from the mood and tone. Some films do not need to tie in every little plot detail in order to make for a more true to life form. Not all families discuss their problems or their angst openly. Most of the time you have to decipher them through little nuanced non-verbal symbols."

Back to my own take: I don't believe you need to be from the big city or the South to empathize with or relate to these characters or this story. My brother and I are in so many ways similar to George and Johnny, and my wife and sister are much like Madeleine and Ashley. Much of our lives include the same types of caring and concern (and lack of) as potrayed in this movie. Our inter-relations are what they are; sometimes happy, sometimes sad, often humorous (in retrospect and to others). I'm pressed to come up with a point to our relationships some (most?) times.



reply

Why should EVERYTHING we watch have a point? Can't we just enjoy a movie for its interesting story, or in this case its characters, and other values the art of film brings with?

Yes we can.

One day I am going to grow wings.

reply

kikirriki wrote:
Why should EVERYTHING we watch have a point? Can't we just enjoy a movie for its interesting story, or in this case its characters, and other values the art of film brings with?
Yes. Works of fiction tell stories. Some of them have a "point," or a "meaning," or a "message," but many don't. Most of the best works of fiction do complex things that cannot be reduced to a "point," or a "meaning," or a "message."

(What is the "point" of Hamlet? There is no agreement on this. If Hamlet had a "point," surely we would have figured it out definitively after 400 years.)

I imagine Purgatory, if it exists, containing many high school English teachers who are doing penance for having taught their students that all works of fiction have a "point," or a "meaning," or a "message."

That is what I was taught in high school. I didn't believe it then, and I don't believe it now.


For easy markup see http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/42255

reply

I'm thinking maybe this movie does have a point, though I have no problem whatsoever with movies that don't. I just love movies! :)
I think it might be trying to show 2 very different "true spirits", in order to help people to stop being prejudiced.
Both Ashley (obviously) and Madeleine (less obviously) are very kind, sweet people who only want to make sure that everybody is happy and OK. They both came from extremely different backgrounds, and thus have different values, but in the end, both are "pure of heart", as the artist said to Madeleine.
The cards are stacked against Madeleine, because she's the only person like her in the film, and I think that might be on purpose. Most people who watch little Indy Movies tend to be on the left end of things (like Madeleine). Not all, obviously.
Just sayin' that maybe the filmmakers were absolutely brilliant in writing and making this! How could anybody ever be prejudiced again about people born and raised in the South or people born and raised in other countries and settling in the city, after meeting Ashley and Madeleine?
Beautiful story! :)

reply

I hope the OPs father didnt spend too much on that thar filum skewel

reply

[deleted]

I thought that way this film was so insistent about its themes was its weakest part. I think it is better to let audiences figure it out themselves than to keep talking about outsiders and finding the humanity in another. WE GET IT. (Or most of us do.)

reply

[deleted]

I'm surprised your father went to film school, yet didn't understand the basic meaning of the movie. I guess there are film schools and then there are film schools.

Anyway, try starting with the title of the movie. They aren't chosen at random. It's called Junebug. What is a Junebug? An insect that has a very short appearance in the world, and a very limited purpose. It shows up in June for a few days at most, is interested only in flitting about finding a mate, and then procreating. It lays it's eggs/larvae which are born the next year, and they repeat the same very limited function.

Well how does this relate to the movie?

1 - There is actually a short scene in the movie that shows the Junebugs (largish, black, moth-like insects) flying about over the lawn outside George's parents house.

2 - George and Madeline are just like the Junebugs. You probably noticed that they show some relatively graphic sex-scenes between the two. In fact, it almost seems that is all they do together, doesn't it? Remind of the above description of junebugs?

3 - It starts off that George and Madeline are a "together" couple, married for only 6 months. They seem to relate to each other in a more complete and sane, thinking way than George's North Carolina family and relatives and friends etc.

4 - George's family initially seem like repressed wierdos who are out of touch with themselves and each other.

5 - As the movie progresses, we start to see that in fact the opposite is true. We learn that George and Madeline don't know much if anything about each others true character. Madeline doesn't know that George is; a wonderful singer (Calling Me Softly hymn in the church) - we see the amazement on her face as she sees and hears her husband sing lead tenor as part of a trio. She doesn't know that he likes his sandwiches with loads of mayonnaise, that he likes to play traveling/word games in the car, that he cheats when he plays. Both of them smoke cigarettes, but keep it a secret from each other. George's brother makes a pass at Madeline, but she never tells him about it. George doesn't realize that Madeline is affected deeply by his family - in the hospital sequence he calls her and says, "Family is important", but in fact she actually understands this and is very upset by the sister-in-law's miscarriage. George just doesn't know anything about his wife's true feelings.

6 - All we see George and Madeline do together throughout the movie is have sex, procreate. George's family and friends are the ones who truly know each other for who they really are. They have a commitment to each other, regardless of circumstances, through good and bad. They accept and love the confused brother, Eugene understands and loves his wife (George's Mom) despite the hard shell she wears on the outside. He says that underneath there is a softness that Madeline doesn't recognize. Even the painter's money-grubbing sister cries and consoles Madeline for the death of her brother-in-law's child. Even she understands what everyone is truly feeling better than George and Madeline do.

The underlying theme here is that it is they (G and M) that are the Junebugs. Appearing in N.C. for a very brief visit, not primarily to visit their relatives, but for Madeline to sign up a new painter for her all-consuming career as a gallery owner. They aren't changed as people, despite seeing all they do in N.C.

During the end scene, in the car, G and M are leaving after "junebugging" for a few days with his family. He says he's glad "to be out of there", she's returning to her art gallery. Basically, they haven't been affected by what has gone on around them, again, just like junebugs who don't notice anything about the surrounding life, they have a myopic view of the world that includes finding a partner and procreating with the same.

Junebug is a wonderfully understated examination of human relationships, especially of how some people seem to just "flit" through life without being concerned for others at all.

There are many, many more scenes in the movie that portray this theme, but I hope that I've given you an idea of what the director/screenwriter etc are trying to convey. In retrospect, I'm hard pushed to think of one, single, unnecessary portion of Junebug. It all has meaning, providing one understands the precept.

Happy flitting!

Dave

reply

[deleted]

*** Spoiler ****

I agree with you sensored. I also consider every scene a work of art, and the movie is near the top of my list of all time favourites.

You're correct, the still-born child was destined to be named Junebug, but I believe that the Ashley character was naming the kid after her brother-in-law George, thereby pointing out another in the continuing series of allusions that identify both him and his wife as "here today, gone tomorrow" characters.

G & M operate on the surface of life, and the rest of the characters have depth and communicate with each other. Think of all the scenes that involve G & M - one of the first is in a NY apt where they are kissing and taking each other's clothes off. The next scene where they are together is in a car, and G has his hand up M's dress the whole time. And all those sex scenes in G's Mom and Dad's house. G & M don't talk to each other! They act just like Junebugs, looking to have sex as frequently as possible.

At first it seems as if they are the uninhibited and emotionally together couple. But as the movie progresses, we learn that sex is the ONLY thing that they seem to know about each other.

If you're interested to learn more about the movie and about Junebugs, please see my review on this site;

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0418773/reviews?filter=chrono

Dave

reply

Fantastic points.

I'm a rare combination of French film buff and thug.

reply

Thank you GossipGirl. My wife and I were talking about the movie after first having watched it back in 2011. It was Maureen who knew about the lifecycle of the JuneBug, and I learnt more by reading the JuneBug Wikipage.

It became clear to us that there was another level of meaning to be found in the movie when you attempted to apply the JuneBugs activity to the characters actions in the film. The one that first stood out in a most glaring fashion was with the graphic sex act between the main couple. I haven't seen such a distinct and "all stops out" sexual coupling in a movie for quite a time.

However, it was not gratuitous, not at all. They act just like JuneBugs, with their focus clearly upon mating for a baby. The far more complex family actions that are going on around them make up real family interactions and communication, on a level that they aren't mature enough to understand at the moment.

reply

5. agree. tho, it's a pretty lame 'point'; and reminds me of the karl kraus line: 'a writer is someone who can make a riddle out of an answer.'



Where there's smoke, there's barbecue!

reply

It seemed pretty profound to me as I watched it, nutsberry. Did you not enjoy the movie? I thought that it was pretty gripping throughout. Interested in your opinion on it.

Dave

reply

oh i enjoyed it. it's better than most movies (say 70%). the 1st act is really good then it starts, and right at the usual time, doing the usual ol' guess what's wrong with these people's behavior game that's in most american indy movies and the more the story goes on this becomes just a form of judgmental tedious gossip that a slightly senile & humorless grandparent would gift someone with--so what the city couple don't know each other that well? so what the artist is a 'bigot'? yeah...people are wacky. sigh...the narrtive's point didn't serve anything save itself and in regards to that point there wasn't a coherent worldview justifying its rather conceited certainty about 'what makes people tick', let alone these 'types' of people.




Where there's smoke, there's barbecue!

reply

I think the claim that Madeleine wasn't concerned at all with the others in the film is inaccurate. She did care, and she tried to extend herself to each and every member of George's family. She didn't have much success in winning them over, or even connecting with them, except for Ashley, but it isn't fair to claim that Madeliene was only interested in her business and in her new husband.

My real name is Jeff

reply

BobbyDupea wrote:

I think the claim that Madeleine wasn't concerned at all with the others in the film is inaccurate.
Completely inaccurate.
She did care, and she tried to extend herself to each and every member of George's family.
Madeleine sees her husband's family as her family, and she wants to be accepted by them.
She didn't have much success in winning them over, or even connecting with them, except for Ashley,
And Eugene, but she makes Eugene nervous because he knows there is an element of sexual attraction in his reaction to her. He knows that he is "committing adultery in his heart" as Jimmy Carter put it.Madeleine on the floor, partway under the dresser, was very sexy.George and Madeleine are only there because Madeleine wants to meet his family. She is completely accepting of his family as she is of the outsider artists that she represents.

reply