MovieChat Forums > Inside Deep Throat (2005) Discussion > Linda Marchiano played both sides

Linda Marchiano played both sides


I recall the "Deep Throat" phenomenon quite clearly. There were a lot of porno films back then, when all restraints on movie morality were lifted: "Debbie Does Dallas" and "The devil In Miss Jones" were two others that became known in the general population. I was at a party one night and when the topic of conversation turned to the movie, a fellow and his girlfriend got up and left. A couple of hours later they returned from the theater. They had gone to see "Deep Throat" so they would know what everyone was talking about. Viewing X-Rated movies carried no shame.

Soon after, hard core porno went out of style as feminist organizations went on a morality kick that would have pleased the much-despised Christian reformers. But, the fems put a different spin on it: they claimed that pornography demeaned women, so they weren't making a moral judgment of sex, but of exploitation of women. Of course, it was the female actors in the films who got the money - male porn stars were a dime a dozen, but victimization had been born as a social and political weapon. It was no longer fashionable to be seen entering or leaving theaters that showed porn flicks. The fad was over. Porno had returned to the shadows from whence it came. "Deep Throat" was nothing more than a cheap porno flick that happened to be made during a very small window of time when porno was chic (pronounced - sheek).

Linda (Marchiano) Lovelace, who had made at least two earlier porno flicks prior to DT (that few ever saw) and a sequel to "Deep Throat" (that only a few ever saw), decided to tell a story of being raped and forced at gunpoint to make "Deep Throat". Of course, the tide had turned and now the same people who had cheered the freedom that spawned "Deep Throat" were either quiet or had seen the error of their ways. No one questioned the absurd story Linda Marchiano told or pressed her on the other films she had made. She was now a feminist hero. She had played both sides and won.

reply

Fairly positive that with the advent of VCR/DVD, more porno films are being made at present than ever before, OP. In regards to viewing such films "carrying shame" nowadays: Can't speak for anyone else but I've no qualms admitting that I enjoy Skinemax AfterDark just as much as the next man and even have some hardcore scenes downloaded and saved on my computer. And I somehow doubt that the majority of Americans(or anyone else on the planet for that matter)gives even 3/4 of a rat's filthy a-s what people do or don't view in the privacy of their own homes either way. If not a subject typically brought up at dinner parties, this for the same reason a blow by blow detailing of a movie like Hostel is equally undesirable at one such gathering; some things are just unwise to do.

reply

Wouldn't go too crazy regarding Marchiano/Lovelace/whateverelsehernameis's alleged Machiavellism, as she was clearly a troubled individual replete with conflicting stories not even she could keep straight i.e. supposed "bruising" on her body during the pool scene of DT, that one has to use a little imagination and even more peyote to actually see.

Don't mean to come across unsympathetic, as she clearly must've endured her share trauma to have ended up with filth like Chuck Traynor, nonetheless facts are...well, facts.

reply

You obviously don't remember TOO clearly, since DDD was shot 6 years later, at the height of the late '70s XXX "boom". The feminist morality kick had been there since day one, they had been going after Playboy since the late '60s (even though Penthouse showed more, Guccione was far less well known, and rarely appeared on discussion shows like those depicted).

My problem with the docu is the fact that both Damiano and Lovelace were given immunity in the Memphis obscenity case (to this day there has been no explanation) is not explored and only very briefly mentioned. Why wasn't Damiano asked about this?

Otherwise, it is an interesting docu about a groundbreaking film, objectionable or not.

reply

"My problem with the docu is the fact that both Damiano and Lovelace were given immunity in the Memphis obscenity case (to this day there has been no explanation) is not explored and only very briefly mentioned. Why wasn't Damiano asked about this?"

It is kind of strange they picked Harry Reems out of him, Damiano and Lovelace to focus the case upon. You would think Damiano would have been the top dog there, but perhaps they gave him immunity because they wanted answers regarding his producing role since he put up part of the money with the Perainos. And Lovelace had the bigger recognition, much moreso than Reems.

reply

[deleted]

Lovelace struck me as a weak personality. Chances are her husband bullied her into he pen roles, but she probably went along without a lot of complaining. Her transformation into feminist posterchild was probably the result of the same kind of browbeating from her newfound feminist allies. Her transformation *again* into pinup girl only seals the deal that she was whatever someone else wanted her to be.

Bettie Paige was the same way; she was 8 different people after her pinup career ended, including remarrying her original husband who had been so mean to her.

reply

[deleted]

It's pretty obvious she just went along with what others guided her into. If you read Ordeal even she admits this, as she does regarding the anti-porn feminists in interviews in this film. First it was her terrible parents, then Chuck Traynor, then David Winters, then the anti-porn feminists. Being gullible and naive is not the same thing as being an unwilling victim.

reply

If someone is "gulling" you, then you ARE a victim. It means to take advantage of. A synonym is "deceive".

reply