MovieChat Forums > Klimt (2006) Discussion > LOW RATING?

LOW RATING?

posted 17 years ago by cokoholicar
5 replies | jump to latest

Why does this movie have such a low rating?

[–] LizaMinelliAteMyFrozenChicken 17 years ago

Because it's pretentious, badly written, badly acted, badly filmed rubbish that for the most part makes no sense. I think that clears it up!

I went to kelis's yard for some milkshake, it was only O.K.

[–] cokoholicar 17 years ago

Yea, that kind of explained it. Thanks.

[–] hitmanzer0 17 years ago

Because most people like movies that make sense.

[–] Harlesden_P_Ruffkins 17 years ago

Making sense is for normal people. Having said that, I haven't seen this film and it may well be crap.

[–] it-breathes-on-its-own 14 years ago

I honestly didn't think it was that bad. There were doubles, reflexivity, etc. that made it interesting--kinda like a De Palma movie. There were a lot of beautiful shots--the faces reflected in the broken mirror really stood out to me. I think you just have to go with the flow a little bit on this one, don't think too much about the dialogue and just get off on the visuals. Mulholland Drive has been mentioned a lot on the board, but I found this more interesting than that, what with it's cliche "it was all a dream ending." Think Bunuel, srsly.