MovieChat Forums > 9 rota (2005) Discussion > The Soviet Union Was Right!

The Soviet Union Was Right!


In the past, I have studied The Soviet War in Afghanistan, and I recently took an interest in it again, which lead me to watching the film "9th Company" and I was impressed. It's nice seeing a film that tells things from the Russian point of view for a change. The Russians had the moral ground from the start in my view because The Soviet Union, along with the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan, were trying to make a better world for the Afghans by changing with the times, making things equal for everyone, bringing education to all of the people who desired it, and were looking to stop poverty. But the Muslim fanatics were against that because all of those ideas were against their religion. They felt Allah has decided how everything is suppose to be, and to change things was a sin against him. So instead of just living their way, and letting others live their way, those Muslim fanatics ended up terrorizing people who were just looking for a good change in their lives.

I'm an American and I wish more Americans understood this, then and now. Back in the 1980's, when U.S. troops who would later die fighting in Afghanistan were just innocent little babies, the U.S.S.R. was fighting radical Islamists - The same types of people future U.S. soldiers would fight one day in the same country. And while Russians were doing the job furture generations would have to take over to do a few generations later, the American government in the 1980's funded and supported the same terrorists they ended up fighting against, and they had American heroes in the likes of Rambo and James Bond acting as the cherry on top of the cake. I also think the film "Red Dawn" was intended to serve as a metaphor for the Russian invasion of Afghanistan.

Truly, my country shot itself in the foot hard for meddling in the affairs of Russia. If the Russians were left alone to do their job in the 1980's, I believe things would be ten times better for the U.S.A. because I have no doubt the beast that was the Soviet Union would have easily run over Afghanistan if the U.S. did not send the Afghans modern weapons. I would have prefered seeing Afghanistan lose to the Russians over seeing my country get attacked on 9/11, going through the money issues my country goes through today as a result of having two wars, including one with the same country the Federal Government helped in the 1980's when facing Russia - Afghanistan, and then reading about so many U.S. soldiers dying. Would things REALLY be that bad if the Soviet Union was still around and Afghanistan was under Russian control?

If the Russians defeated the Afghan rebels in the 1980's, 9/11 and the wars that the U.S. was apart of that followed would have never happened most likely because Bin Laden and the men like him would have bigger things to worry about and deal with then the United States of America.

reply

The film seems a hack of many US Vietnam films but the comments show why I hate Americans when they open their mouths to say anything, and do almost anything for the sake of stupidty. As they Americans most often deal with the devil to pay Peter and Paul, then have their stock brokers rob Peter and Paul to pay the devil, by talking all too cleverly while eating the cake they then greedily want to keep as that cake also.

By saying "Back in the 1980's, when U.S. troops who would later die fighting in Afghanistan were just innocent little babies, the U.S.S.R. was fighting radical Islamists - *** I believe things would be ten times better for the U.S.A. because I have no doubt the beast that was the Soviet Union would have easily run over Afghanistan if the U.S. did not send the Afghans modern weapons." you just prove that American are brainless or brainwashed trash that believes almost any thing without any sense of complication that involves real principles.

Frankly if the Russians destroyed Afganistan and the Americans did not help Islamic extremists Americans would not have died in vain doing it for them, for frankly Afghanistan would have been better as Soviet which thirty years later could have been selling western tourists shish-a-barbi rather than being corrupted by western politicians in support of the great western military industrial complex.

Who is to say that the CCCP would not have reformed itself, and needed the US, as the US can't reform itself in the gridlock it exists for god's and life's but sows the seeds of the dragons of dissent to live in another thousand years in war which can be avoided.

Andrew Stergiou
Altoona, Pa 16602
*beep*
©opyright 2011 Andrew Stergiou

reply

Dear OP, no one asked for USSR's *help*. They had a puppet Afghan leader installed and wanted Afghanistan for its natural resources. How would you like it if a Muslim country decided to attack and rule America simply because they dont like the way you are living? Wouldnt you fight back???

Please dont spread lies and hate about a country and its religion.

reply

[deleted]

The communist government of Afghanistan, which came to power in 1978 independently, DID indeed ask the USSR for its help. The PDPA government spent a year begging the Soviets to send troops to help put down the CIA-backed Mujahideen rebellion. The Soviets refused multiple times, and only finally acquiesced when it looked like Afghanistan was on the verge of collapse.

And that is utter bullsh!t, that the Soviets wanted Afghanistan's resources. The USSR was a socialist state with a centrally-planned economy that didn't need to exploit other countries' resources for profit. Also it was one of the most mineral-rich countries in the world and didn't need Afghanistan's minerals. The Soviets went there to assist the Afghans in defending their revolution so they could develop their own country.

-------------------------------------
Former username Kawada_Shogo

reply

No, I simply disagree with your assertion.

The former Soviet Union may have indeed wanted to upgrade civilization in Afghanistan, but the means to an end, which would have been to serve as a subject puppet nation, of the Soviet empire.

America has never wanted to permanently occupy Afghanistan. We kept making that clear to the Afghan people since 2002. America hoped to give the Afghans an excellent opportunity to upgrade and improve their country, post-Taliban, to a country modernized with infrastructure, health, better food, human rights, and equal rights for women. But clearly to this American, me, in this year 2012, despite American motivations, Afghans see Americans as just another white-skinned group of invaders speaking a foreign language, trying to impose their will upon them. It is tragic. It is a cause for sorrow because Americans truly wanted the best for Afghanistan and its people. Yes, I admit that had this experiment succeeded, a modernized Afghanistan would be friendly, it was hoped, to the West and America. But if Afghans prefer a life resembling that of their Golden Age, the year, 1000 AD, and to be ruled by despots, that women should remain disposable property, then there is little else we Americans can do at this point but to make Afghans happy by evacuating their country asap. In the short term, this will reign in chaos and destruction. But it is something that the long history of Afghanistan has conditioned their people to adapt to and eventually some kind of order will come out of it, but on Afghan terms, not American and not the United Nations.

The only lessons I see here are that Russia and the United States did not understand the lessons of history at all. We didn't even read the lessons of British history in Afghanistan which would have shown Russians and Americans what to do. I won't go into detail, but the lesson out of the three, Anglo-Afghan Wars is to go in strong, armed to the teeth, organized, coordinated, fast; kick butt, destroy the Afghan military, destroy any militia sent out against you, and then as quickly evacuate the country. With the wisdom of hindsight, Americans should have evacuated Afghanistan after completely routing the Taliban. If done that way, a warlord would be running most of the country now, but instead, the prolonged American presence has encouraged the return of the Taliban.

reply

The Mujahideen war wasn't actually about religion. It's true that it was led by fundamentalists, but the root cause of the war was the class struggle. Afghanistan's communist government was nationalizing the country's resources and redistributing land from the big landlords to the peasantry. This infuriated the landlord class, naturally. The rural clergy was intimately tied to the class structure of the Afghan countryside, and so defined the struggle in religious terms (they couldn't very well just say "oh hey guys, the big bad commies want you to have your own land, whereas we want to own all the land for ourselves, so you need to fight for us so we can own all of your land"). Religion was used for rallying purposes but the root causes of the war were material.

It should also be noted that the Afghan communists weren't necessarily anti-Islam, and they were supported by many Muslims.

The US didn't actually shoot itself in the foot in Afghanistan. It did exactly what it wanted to do, attacking a socialist state that represented a threat to US economic, political and military hegemony over the globe. The defeat of Afghanistan's socialist revolution opened the door for American companies to profit from Afghanistan's resources. And since the USSR ended up disappearing too (not because of the war, but nevertheless), it also opened the way to the oil fields of Soviet Central Asia. Plus this so-called "war on terror" gives the US the perfect excuse to wage permanent, ceaseless, never-ending war in country after country, making enormous profits for the American capitalist oligarchy that benefits from wars and their aftermath. No, the US got exactly what it wanted out of Afghanistan. And the Afghan people lost everything.

-------------------------------------
Former username Kawada_Shogo

reply

The only thing there is to understand, is that USA like always was putting its dirty fingers into other people's honey pots. Afghanistan to USA was just another proxy to fight the Soviets.

Dont even for a second argue that USA was fighting for the rights of the "Poor Afghans and nice Muslims".

Then again karma is a bitch cuz the Taliban inflicted so much damage on the USA afterwards

reply

[deleted]

They both sucked and still to this day.Both are ideologies of tyranny. Islam has spread by the sword since the days of Mo. It's who they are and what they do. Communism is an equally barbaric and murderous ideology, having murdered around 100 million people worldwide in the last century. There's probably no counting the victims of islamist warmongers in the 1400 years of their march of savagery. from across the middle east to the Hindu Kush and beyond. Africa and southern Europe even to the Balkans invaded and pillaged,their populations given a simple choice to convert or die never to leave under pain of death.

reply