There is also the added attraction of the very handsome French actor Stanley Weber.
http://www2.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Stanley+Weber+Ruth+Alex+Premiere+41st+Deauville+DHMDc6hJ-k4l.jpg
He is in the second season of Outlander and even manages to look good in a powdered wig. LOL!
He's very cute, Laura!
And that's definitely RA in the new pic.
But with 'The Hobbit' hardly anyone goes "Oh Martin Freeman, wasn't he in 'The Hobbit'?", let alone remember any of the others--except for those who had been in LotR already (McKellen, Bloom, Lee, Blanchett)...
Yeah, TH failed to make an impression with anyone. Sad, really. I had higher expectations for the trilogy but was disappointed in the end.
Birds, I had read your earlier post before the edit and I have to say that I do agree with what you had written before. I felt the same but since I don't have the exact words from your post, let me just tell you what I think about TH.
Honestly, I have been disappointed in PJ even before TH given what he did to the Tintin adaptation. Seeing that it was going to be a live-action cartoon wasn't something I was excited about. And on actually viewing it, I was more than disappointed with the outcome. I think what PJ tried to do was showcase his VFX talent he has in Weta - a company he created. And I think he had the same approach (sadly) with TH as well. He had all that 48fps business which I thought was interesting but ultimately it didn't go down well at all; and all that animation over traditionally what were props and practical effects (despite the questionable stunts from LOTR too) made the movies look more like a videogame in the end.
You're right; PJ had all that talent at his disposal and it was essentially wasted because under all the prosthetics and the little to no character development he gave them, it didn't matter who was under all that makeup. In the end, nobody could remember all the 13 dwarves names or what they looked like and
that, I believe, was a
huge mistake on his part.
I've only read the TH by Tolkien, so I can't make any comparison to LoTR in that respect. But yes, the book had major flaws too even though I quite enjoyed the reading. I thought Tolkien was a good storyteller. But I wasn't a fan of Bilbo from the book because of what he did and his participation in the final battle. The dwarves had no character expect for the brothers, the uncle(king) and the fat one (this part unfortunately also stayed true in the movies). Movie Bilbo was an improvement IMO but I honestly wish we got more dialogue, more interaction, more of a journey (which I loved in the book) and therefore, more of a development in storytelling (which the book had) from the movies.
The best parts of the book for me was the journey through the Mirkwood forest and meeting Beorn and their capture by the Elves.
All that was significantly chopped for highly questionable scenes and other filler material (did we really need the Kili-Tauriel love-story? ). I mean, they had a trilogy for pete's sake! 9 hours to convert a really short (children's) book on-screen. It
seemed more than doable (because I thought they only needed 6 hrs at most but was glad they were getting 9 hrs instead). I had so much faith and supported the trilogy announcement when it was made. I kept thinking (and hoping) that Beorn would show up in the end since his part was shortened from before, but he didn't (I can't remember if he did now, but he wasn't focused on in the end as I had hoped, which was an utter shame IMO) and I still can't understand why. The final battle's set-up itself was a complete disappointment for me in retrospect. I enjoyed it at the time but it could have been sooo much better.
I remember first getting that dreaded feeling after watching the escape scene from Goblin town. For me,
that was the point which set the tone for the entire trilogy and that's when the disappointment and realization kicked in.
PJ made some questionable decisions. It could have been soo much better than it was in the end and that is sad to know. What hurts is that TH came and went and no one cares now. As you know, I wouldn't shy away from blaming an actor even if it were RA. If RA's acting was questionable, I wouldn't hesitate to spill my opinion on it and theorize on his Hollywood career as we know it; but it was totally
not his fault. He did the best he could do (and more!) with what he was given. And so, admitting that it was PJ's fault is really what is terrible about the whole thing. I think I now understand (finally) the Star Wars prequel trilogy comparison.
reply
share