Undertaker Vs JBL


Am I the only one who thinks that this match was the most amazing 1 on 1 matches of all time. For goodness sake it had everything,so much actions and little submissions, every1 thinks JBL sucks but he kickd out of a chokeslam!(and everything else done to him). This match was sooo under rated. The Randy Orton/Benoit match was overated, there were so many slow moving submissions that no one ever taps out to, and most of the time they were eithe rin submission or outside the ring. Then benoit was about to win and suddenly evolution comes out (predictable) to help him win. because the title changed hands, this match was over rated. I watched this PPV w/ my m8s and we all agreed this match was boring and the JBL/Undertaker was one of the best matches ever!

reply

yeh i agree the Randy Orton/Benoit match was overated and the JBL/Undertaker match was good (Not amazing).

and evolution did not cum out durin the main event orton won the title cleanly with the RKO.

u must b getin confused with the rematch on RAW the night after!

reply

oh yeah, maybe. But still, I think the Taker/JBL match should have been the main event.

reply

No the whole show was set out perfect. Randy Orton vs Chris Benoit was the best to be main event. IMO the reason they didnt put JBL vs UT as the main event is because they main evented No Mercy. Randy Orton vs Chris Benoit was a perfect match no interference and a clean pinfall for a heel. I loved it.

reply

Taker vs JBL is one of the best 1 on 1 matches I've ever seen, awesome!! ^_^

reply