Well done to this movie for breaking a certain cliche
Please dont read this thread if you havent seen the movie, because i will be giving away a major spoiler
I liked the way this movie went against the grain of a certain cliche that often happens in movies like this.
Why is it that whenever you have a movie like this where its some sort of killer of any kind, and the killer goes after a certain group of people, whether its a group of friends, a uni or college on a field trip ect, and they consist of males and females (whether its 2 females and 2 males, or 2 females and 3 males ect), why is it that the lone survivour of the group is always a female???
This is the first movie of this kind i have seen where the lone survivour was a male. Maybe they played on that so it would lend itself as more of a twist?.
I didnt think the two females made a very smart decision at one time though. They pushed their getaway vechile off the cliff/gorge so it would make the killer think they carelessly drove it overboard and think they were dead and give up looking for them. And what if he spotted you??, what if he saw your rear brake lights go on from a distance (it was pitch dark afterall)....he would of known you were still alive and you would of rendered yourself more helpless by ridding of your getaway vechile.
I think in this situation i would of stayed in the vechile and just found an alternative route with it, cause even if the guy pressumed you were dead and gave up looking for you.....now you gotta trek through miles and miles of australian wilderness on foot at night time!!!.....good luck with that.