MovieChat Forums > The Fountain (2006) Discussion > I will never trust IMDB ratings and sugg...

I will never trust IMDB ratings and suggestions again...


Seriously, please tell me that this is all a joke... the ratings, the good comments.. is it all a bait for trolls (like the one I'm about to be) and haters (like the one I'm about to seem to be)?

This is one of the worst movies ever made in the history of the world. I don't understand how it can be even called "a movie". Everything is cheap, pointless, messy. Don't get me wrong: the message is clear, the meaning is clear, but everything used to bring this message to the viewer is boring to the point of being irritating (when you manage not to fall asleep).

How can this movie get more than 4 or (top) 5 stars from the people who watched (considering the suggestions on IMDB) "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind"? Or "The Adjustment Bureau"? Or "Hereafter"? 2001? Lynch movies... Cronenberg movies... Kubrick movies...

This is the first time in my life I troll like this but I'm seeing comments like "best movie ever", "personal fav.", "top 5", etc... Please explain to me so I can dream of improving myself and join the club... Or poor me I will have to find another website to trust for rating and suggestions.

Thanks

reply

Different people have different emotional responses to movies. I think you should just move on.

reply

Yes, agree !

reply

Melotron and RZN, you write off the opinion of a wise man...this was an art film schlock piece of junk LIKE Cronenberg or Lynch, etc and one that no one should have wasted a nickel to watch (I watched for free on cable tv and don't know how I made it other than wanting to see how it ever got a 7.2 on IMDB.

Aranosky should be banned to the weird world...much like Alejandro Jodorowsky (of El Topo and The Magic Mountain fame).

reply

...schlock piece of junk LIKE Cronenberg or Lynch, etc and one that no one should have wasted a nickel to watch...


Sometimes it's very hard not be called out as an anti-semite (no matter what heritage you have, yes that is right) when some people are so dead set on furfilling bad stereotypes.

lets ban all those who do not feed us with cheap hollywood productions that only serves maximizing profit.

This thread is littered with astroturfing.

Ignorance is only a bliss if you haven't reached awareness.
My imdb posts are getting altered.

reply

This is my all-time favorite film. To note, I also love Lynch, Scorsese, Charlie Kaufman-written movies, etc.

This movie is brilliant the way it all comes together. To anyone of my friends I discuss the movie with, I always say the key is in Izzi's book. That's the movie: Her book is the movie, start to finish.

reply

The Fountain is my favorite movie, yet I also love movies like Fight Club.

How does that make you feel?

reply

hey, I hate coffee so I don't drink any of it. yet millions aparently like it as is. This movie is epic to me. If it is not for you, that's okay too.
On my multiple viewings, I don't see cheap, pointless, messy, I see beautiful images, quality sets, HUGE human emotional depth about love and our life, and a very tightly written story. Age affects movie perceptions also. I'm old, have lived, loved and lost, so this story resonates in me.

reply

"Quality sets"?

If only we could see them!!!

Where were the LIGHTS??? We see them performing brain surgery in a very DIMLY LIT operating theatre. Just because it was only a monkey's brain they were working on... doesn't mean they should dim the lights to save on the electric bill.

RIDICULOUS!!!

reply

Come on, dude... the lights played an important role on this movie... we only see a strong light on the scenes that the characters was "illuminated" by the idea of moving on, for exemplo, like when Izzi fainted on the museum. Tommy character was in a dark place of hit mind in most parts of the film, thats why the scenes were so dark. When he knew how the book should end all we see is a shower of good-golden-lightning stars

reply

There is a reason for this, it was a style used where the start of the film starts dark, and it gradually gets lighter and lighter until the end of the movie, the ends on a pure white screen.

Some people like this, I am one of them, you obviously didn't.

reply

I watched this one solely because of high IMDB ratings and I must say this: Wow, and again WOW... Hour and 36 minutes of pure, genuine boredom. The experience that I do not wish to repeat any time soon.

reply

one has to research something a little bit.

Maybe 2001 is a "10" in teh sci-fi genre, but I doubt my girlfiend would enjoy it AT ALL just because it got a 10 rating. Just an example.

Likewise, maybe a chickflick is a 10, but that doesn't mean I would enjoy it on any level :D

I can't wait to view THE FOUNTAIN again

reply

[deleted]

Aside from lots of booze I don't do drugs and yet The Fountain and Eternal Sunshine are 2 of my 3 favorite movies ever. Both films using their narrative to show an internal mental struggle they need patience, but are never boring. Thought provoking and beautiful films.


Oh, and the other member of my Top 3 is Braveheart, so go figure.

reply

What exactly is a "chickflick"? I'm kind of being sarcastic here, but seriously, when people talk about so-called "chickflicks" are they talking about "romantic-comedies" or "romance" films? If so, how does that make a film a specific gender/sex oriented? Shouldn't movies be enjoyed by all humans, without there being these ridiculous gender/sex lines? Who says romance is a "feminine" thing?

Speaking of which, isn't "The Fountain" a stereotypical "chickflick" anyway. It's got romance in it....

reply

[deleted]

Men and women are different physically and, in turn, mentally. They have different hormones, different evolutionary purposes, different brain construction etc, so why wouldn't there be different genres that appeal more to one sex versus another? I k ow that modern dogma teaches that men and women are exactly the same in every respect, but it's 100 percent false. I'm sure you can guess what gender this was written by.

Please excuse any typos, this was typed on an iPad

reply

? OBVIOUSLY romance doesn't make it a chick flick & this is not a chic flick. darren aronofsky doesn't really direct chic flics.

chick flicks are usually movies that are predictable mushy romantic tragedies or comedies that often don't have much substance.. like 27 dresses, a walk to remember, bride wars, legally blonde, a cinderella story, clueless, sorority wars, jawbreaker, sisterhood of the traveling pants, etc of course it doesn't mean that a guy can't like them! lots of guys like some chic flicks. though more often than not they're too sappy & focused on girl drama.
there are some good 'classic' ones like sex & the city (my boyfriend probably asks to watch it more than i do) cruel intentions, she's all that, 10 things i hate about you, blue crush, save the last dance, bring it on, though the line between categories is kind of based on opinion. like some people would say a movie like bridesmaids or clerks II or the wedding singer are chic flicks.. while i, & i think most people would just say they're pretty good comedies. for a while they've been making a niche for movies like that that are in between the typical guy comedy & typical chic flicks that are better than your avg.. they're a little raunchier or have a bit more substance than before.. like juno, easy a, knocked up, the change up, no strings attached etc

reply

"I watched this one solely because of high IMDB ratings and I must say this: Wow, and again WOW... Hour and 36 minutes of pure, genuine boredom. The experience that I do not wish to repeat any time soon."
I doubt I could but that any better, really, I was so disappointed in IMDB ratings when I watched this, but my faith has been restored once again by recent movies.. maybe I'll watch this again in a couple of years.
I feel like its all a huge troll..

reply

to the O.P. - Just because a movie doesn't do anything for you, doesn't make it a bad movie. I watched the original Japanese version of the horror movie "The Ring" and found it not very scary and a bit boring *BUT* it's obviously a very well made movie and I can understand why it's so popular.

The Fountain is a beautiful, original and engaging movie but it's also unlikely to have universal appeal.

A movie can still be good, even if it doesn't appeal to you personally.


-B-

"There are kingly virtues other than bravery, Courtesy is one of them!"
Ynyr- Krull

reply

this movie is very suggestive of bondage and necrophilia. overly dramatic relationships relayed by actor's play and close up face filming achieve in one peculiar kind of aesthetics. it does appeal to the deviant and emo community. stop whining, start frowning.

reply

Mr-Bryce: this movie is very suggestive of bondage and necrophilia.

You are either a brilliant troll, in which I commend you; or you're a sad fool, in which I pity you.

reply

so if i get this straight... you praise deception, and despise sagacity. Are you making my point ?

reply

so if i get this straight... you praise deception, and despise sagacity. Are you making my point ?

If the only thing you got out of this film was necrophilia, bondage, deception, and sagacity... then you are very, very different from the "average" person. Usually I consider different a good thing, but in your case, I think it's a bit disturbing to be honest.

When there's movie a about such love, passion, care, trust, imagination, determination, hope, spirituality, knowledge, and so forth, and you're only able to reduce its qualities to things like necrophilia (which personally doesn't even make sense because he does not engage in sexual intercourse with a corpse, and his only love is for the soul of his wife who died, which is a universal and natural feeling) then I honestly don't even want to imagine how you view other positive things in life.

You seem to be the type of person who takes positive things, and tries to manipulate others into thinking that these positive things are in fact horrors, which in reality only applies to you and the others with your bizarre philosophy. What movies do you actually like? And what religion are you by the way?

And if you are a troll, then congratulations, because you succeeded into trolling the *beep* out of me.

reply

yes, the plot had potential. composition and play, still, are questionnable.
you chose to retain an idealistic and naive view of the movie, what will apppear to you as poetic and spiritual seems like an obvious flag to me.
i chose to take it for granted and rather focus on how the message is conveyed and what the producer appealed to. this absolute love theme has been treated in different ways in similar movies. Amongst imdb's suggestions is eternal sunshine which is brilliant enough to keep my criticism down. Being agnostic i am very interested in most religions ancestral wisdom, and cautious about their litteral or anachronic interpretations. right now i would much rather focus my concerns towards nature than towards any rule of men.
Sure enough, most westerners will get enthusiastic at cutting edge medicine, levitating monks, trippy fractals and astronomy. To me however, the whole movie was dark and claustrophobic, very reminding of the anthropocentric nature of modern society.
you seem to care a lot about this movie and it did reach you on an emotionnal level.
Getting personnal in a discussion often comes from a lack valid arguments.
Saying you were disturbed by words i used, yet werent you disturbed at the pain and perversity most obviously portrayed by the inquisitor's scenes?
Or is it because such mainstream content is overlooked and unnamed ?
With that sort of content being treated as anecdotic, i do not expect this "average" person you speak of to be receptive to the tortured nature of the protagonists relationship. to the relationship between the main character and his boss. to the recurring attitude and expression on their faces.
Which kind of graphic content and language would be required for a movie to be described as suggestive of sexuality ? Would it apply solely to porn movies ?
Can you relate this to necrophilia ?
there is no reason to label my analysis as a philosophy, nor my confidence as a manipulative influence.
we are receptive on different filters, with different levels of awareness.
i enjoyed your further detailed argumentation :)

reply

yes, the plot had potential. composition and play, still, are questionnable.
you chose to retain an idealistic and naive view of the movie, what will apppear to you as poetic and spiritual seems like an obvious flag to me.
i chose to take it for granted and rather focus on how the message is conveyed and what the producer appealed to. this absolute love theme has been treated in different ways in similar movies. Amongst imdb's suggestions is eternal sunshine which is brilliant enough to keep my criticism down. Being agnostic i am very interested in most religions ancestral wisdom, and cautious about their litteral or anachronic interpretations. right now i would much rather focus my concerns towards nature than towards any rule of men.
Sure enough, most westerners will get enthusiastic at cutting edge medicine, levitating monks, trippy fractals and astronomy. To me however, the whole movie was dark and claustrophobic, very reminding of the anthropocentric nature of modern society.
you seem to care a lot about this movie and it did reach you on an emotionnal level.
Getting personnal in a discussion often comes from a lack valid arguments.
Saying you were disturbed by words i used, yet werent you disturbed at the pain and perversity most obviously portrayed by the inquisitor's scenes?
Or is it because such mainstream content is overlooked and unnamed ?
With that sort of content being treated as anecdotic, i do not expect this "average" person you speak of to be receptive to the tortured nature of the protagonists relationship. to the relationship between the main character and his boss. to the recurring attitude and expression on their faces.
Which kind of graphic content and language would be required for a movie to be described as suggestive of sexuality ? Would it apply solely to porn movies ?
Can you relate this to necrophilia ?
there is no reason to label my analysis as a philosophy, nor my confidence as a manipulative influence.
we are receptive on different filters, with different levels of awareness.
i enjoyed your further detailed argumentation :)


Well, you've proved very well that you're incapable of having an actual reasonable debate with, as any points I make will just be disregarded by you, so I'll just leave you with the only logical comment I can think of...

Watch from 2:10 to 2:20 to hear my thoughts. Good day sir! :]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-2E3_vfxfw

reply

Man, you squeezed every bit of negativity you could out of this movie. *Troll Alert* Try to see the positive things in life, you'll live longer.

reply

yeah there definitely was a pattern of negative material in this movie :) also i would say overly positive people tend to live short and confused. funny you say that actually because i m quite confident on longevity prospects, and i doubt it to be unrelated to that critical sense so inconvenient to most ;) you should get rid of the troll fog, get some real tools to process arguments with more clarity.

reply

It is you that failed in the debate mr bryce. You wrote a long response unrelated to the questions he asked. You just layered bs up on bs and was all over the place without actually addressing anything worth while. I will leave with a great complement towards you; you are one the better trolls I have seen. I very much like this style of not going for the fast cheap shots, rather slathering it across the floor so mere mortals slip on it. Bravo.

reply

For me this was the stand out film of the year. I was in tears by the end. I guess I found a connection as I found out my grandmother had cancer 2 years in advance and as in this film it took a hard lesson in letting go and letting nature take its course.

For me this film is about control and knowing when you have no control over things and letting go. Its also about just being there for someone and treating them just as they want you too and sacrificing your self, your emotions, your needs for theirs. This is the biggest test for anyone too do in life and I was very upset because I found this hard to do.

When my grandmother died I was watching the reactions in the waiting room. Her children "moaning my mother is gone". I just wanted to shout at them back saying "its not about you , cant you see it from your mothers point of view, how scared she was its about her its HER TIME !"

I think we forget this in life sometimes we focus on our own reality to much when we should look from the outside in and see the bigger picture. That's why this film is great because it shows a truly out side in perspective on what its like for people with cancer. Because it dares to dream and isn't scared of its self.

reply

Thank you for that beautiful post, it was very much needed.

reply

Best explanation I've heard.

reply

Welcome to this thing called world, comprised of people having different opinions. Some people like things (love it with passion or just like it) and some people dislike things (hate it with passion or just don't like it). This is how things work, better deal with it. Instead of pointing out why you didn't like this movie you just trolled about it, with all sorts of exaggerations and concluded to the banal generality of stating that this movie is the worst movie ever made.

reply