80 Grand
Shot for 80 Grand. And you can tell.
share[deleted]
THAT IS SAD. VERY VERY SAD. What did they spend the money on?!?!?!?!?!?!
share[deleted]
I wish my film gets a deal with blockbuster.
shareyou're going to hell
http://www.coprophagor.com/flatmar.htm
>posted by drunknbear (Sat Nov 4 2006 21:36:33 )
>THAT IS SAD. VERY VERY SAD. What did they spend the money on?!?!?!?!?!?!
To the above poster. Are you a moron? 80 Grand is NOTHING for shooting a feature film. It's MICRO budget. It doesn't even rise to the SAG standard for Ultra Low Micro budget (which is 200,000). Even the ultra low is $650,000 budget. Low budget is under 3 Million. Dude, don't show your ignorance for all the world to see.
Yeah? Can 80 grand be right? To shoot a movie like this one - that doesn't seem right. More like 800K seems right to pay salaries for Furlong, Railsback, and others plus all the other stuff.
shareYou CAN spend only 80 Grand if everyone does it for almost 'free'. But that's a STEAL! Usually only high brow 'indies' get this type of support from the cast, but you still gotta pay the crew, rent the cameras, lights, sound equipment, etc. 80 Grand is ridiculously low, but it can be done if everyone on the project is supportive and takes 'pennies on the dollar' for their usual day rate.......
Now the only question is... why? Why would anyone cut their day rate for THIS MOVIE!???!?!?!
_______________________________________
Dr. Kila Marr was right. Kill the Crystalline Entity.
StoneGriffin, BAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAA
that is all. good day.
Berniegrim! hahahahaha. You're funny. Too bad too many folks are blithering idiots when it comes to movie budgets (not you, but OTHERS on the internet). They think that movies magically appear on the tube or big screen with no cost and no time involved. But its' nice that you are one of the few who understands the costs and labor involved in making a movie, even a bad one.
Dr. Kila Marr was right. Kill the Crystalline Entity.share