Pretty good flick!


I was pleasantly surprised by this movie. It is a low budget movie, but some of the performances are pretty good, and the screenplay isn't half bad either. I enjoyed it, and really identified with a few of the characters too. I'd watch it again...I'd watch it several more times if they all did it naked, though. lol (they're all HOT)


No, no..."cruelty." I always think that has a nobler ring to it.
watch

reply

it was an OK film. would be so much better if they were all naked. Tyler was sexy and a half. So was the guy who posted the internet ad. looking forward to seeing more stuff from this cast. love that they shot this in the west village. I recognized alot of the places

reply

[deleted]


The flick was ok. Casper Andeas' acting was mediocre. I enjoyed all the male supporting characters and the female friend. I especially loved, Peter. I can so relate to him. I want to find a guy that I feel romantically and emotionally linked to. No meaningless sex. It's hard in NYC.

www.myspace.com/catrachopapi



reply

The first time I saw this was at a Gay film festival. I rented it recently and liked it more the second time through. I was a bit put off by the title but the movie turned out to be pretty fair. Actually, when you find out Casper Andreas had about 10 hats and did it in 14 days, it was a masterpiece. That said, I don't know why his speaking at certain times in the movie is so stilted. And for a movie with the line "he came all over my chest and I made him lick it off" I would think there would be at least brief frontal nudity. Heck, they were even a bit coy with the underwear shots. And finally, even though Mr. Andreas has a fine body, and great teeth, he is not the least bit attractive to me. Frankly, I thought he looked a lot better with his natural brown hair in the interviews as opposed to bleached blonde in the film. And Peter was a cutie too.

reply

I really like the film, but it is definitely less of a sex comedy than Four Letter Word, and definitely not as Slutty as the title would have you believe.

Peter is a very lovable character but his whole story line was rushed and not completely flushed out. We got the minimum of information about him, and he seemed to be present mostly when they needed someone judgmental. Having seen the character in the next film, I almost don't recognize him. For the relationship stable in the second film, I also would have expected to see more of the building up in the first film, esp since their one date is featured in the trailer.

Am I the only one who did not find the Tyler guy attractive at all??? Yes he had a good body but his hair and facial hair were so gross.

Jessie Archer is the stand out of the film for me. Perhaps I am biased having seen, and loved, Four Letter Word before this, but he has such good comic timing. I would have liked to have seen him used more in this film.

All in all, I really like this film, and it proves that Casper Andreas is a great film maker. But I do think that it is less of a sex comedy, than it is a romantic comedy or drama.

reply

Really? lol!

reply