I'm not a fan of the finale
You should be. It was the ending which had been foreshadowed and hinted at from the beginning.
First of all, purgatory is believed in by some sects of Christianity, in Catholicism there is a special realm for babies that died before they were baptized, yikes they don't just get to go to heaven....
The main point you make is that there is no one "Christian afterlife" you can point to and judge. There are vastly varying views, as must be expected from a religion numbering 2 billion.
Then there is the real world effects. Now while Christianity has done some good for communities and can help individuals, there is a whole lot of evil that has come with that good. The death toll that has come in the name of Christianity is without number, on top of other just awful acts and stealing from the poor to fill their pockets. While the Lost finale just resulted in some disgruntled fans.
There is no way for you to judge the "real world effects" of Christianity without a test case to scientifically compare what the world would have been like without Christianity (a "Sideways" in other words.) It isn't enough to observe the deficits of Christianity without observing the benefits. You can count the lives you think Christianity took. But a valid assessment requires also knowing how many lives were saved by the presence of Christianity. And you simply don't know that.
Of course there are parts of the world in which Christianity never made much of an impact, like India and the Islamic empire and China. Or you could compare to a place like Russia/USSR which went from being Christian to godless atheist for 75 years.
Perhaps you are arguing that the world would be a better place if we were all Hindu, Muslim, or socialist/atheist? I don't think the "real world" evidence supports this view.
But what the real world does show is that the combined effect of all religions on earth has led to positive conditions in which the human population has flourished. If you are measuring positivity by human lives, there can be no question that the advent of religions some 4-5 thousand years ago has led to the human race going from a population of several million to a population of 7 billion.
Such population growth does not occur under "bad" conditions. And I assume you are aware of the rapid human population growth which has occurred since the advent of large, organized religions. Therefore, I must guess that you actually have other criteria for what constitutes a "good" cultural element other than the simple preservation of human life.
reply
share