I hate our people


Man i hate us!
We were horrible to the native people

reply

Don't hate. Just learn more about what happened.

One of the primary reasons the US Gov. doesn't do much for the Native American is because the amount of shame and negative publicity that would ensue with the general publics knowledge of past events; and especially with conditions today in modern indian country.

I still remind friends and fellow posters that I, as an American Indian, I am not angry with the general population. What offends me is ignorance. I get offended when people tell me it did not happen or it is a communistic agenda, or just forget about it and move on. Ignorant--rascists piss me off. Things were much worse than what was shown on Into the west. Much worse. Stuff that still resonates today.

I hold Fed, state administrations, and people of the past accountable. I hold people who were directly involved accountable.

I also hold tribal governments (and individuals) today somewhat responsible because, they are the first people to deal with the existing problems.

The modern problems in indian country are many, so I always tell people to learn as much about the past and present situation as possible. It one of the only ways to know what actually happend.

-THX_1139-

reply

[deleted]

I hadn't checked this site in several days. Thought most everone had gone on to
another site by now. Glad to see you are still around.

Tyty, don't give up that change can never occur. Hate and fear may make things
happen, but they won't change the underlying conditions that cause so much
misery. Do what THX suggested~ learn more. I know I have really opened my
eyes due to the comments I have read on all of the posts on ITW.

Then send an email to any elected official you have any influence on. We still
can vote and they have to know it. I saw on the news this morning that
Indian mascots with offensive sounding names will no longer be allowed
by the NCAA in post season games in 2006. We can change things, it's just
very slow and frustrating.

Also, I was glad to see several people were interested in teaching positions
on the reservations.

reply

Well said, THX. Education is the key.

reply

Years ago I had the opportunity to spend a year teaching on a reservation. When I came, I was afraid. Fear of the unknown. But by the time I left, I had fallen in love with the people. I wasn't a good teacher but I have some marvelous memories of individuals I met. After traveling and spending time in various places, even though I am a caucasian, I've come to feel that white men are perhaps the people most in need of an enlightened education. We are all human beings and wouldn't it be nice if people would just treat others with respect and in the way they themselves would like to be treated. It might also be worth mentioning that the value of a people shouldn't have to be based on how much material goods they possess, but on the greatness of their heart. I've seen this time and time again, as for example down in rural Mexico, and in the far north of Canada where Inuit people were extremely kind to me, a stranger in need of assistance. Yet in other cases when in time of need I hoped for some advice or help or moral support from whites, they were too busy with their own things to bother doing anything nice for me. That's too typical. They haven't yet learned that material goods bring a shallow, hollow kind of pleasure, not true happiness which I think can't happen without a clear conscience.

reply

Excellent post, bodryn. Thanks for all your comments; IMO, you are right on.

reply

Thank you, THX, I wholeheartedly agree with you. You can't change history but you can make darn sure you don't repeat it. My oldest son is part Sioux by way of his father and grandmother and I feel it is so very important for him to know where he came from and that he know his heritage on both sides. Since watching this series with him, he has immersed himself in books, began asking questions of his grandparents and father and has a better understanding of what and who he is. Most importantly, he has chosen to take steps to what he can do to try and make a difference TODAY. It is his hope that he can someday return to South Dakota and contribute to his Indian family. Steven Spielberg is to be commended for the bold step he took in making this series. He has touched this family and we will be forever grateful.

reply

hi bucky ,i have to say that this is the fourth time that i have watched into the west,every time i watch it,its hard not to cry.i know this movie only shows a little bit of the hard ship and cruelty that of the past.i am 38 years old and it takes a lot for me to cry but to see and hear the hard ship that the native americans had to put up with,well it just gets to me.

reply

Yeah- I have noticed the gov't tends to gloss over what it doesn't want us to know about (those things that don't help our 'America is great' ideal.) I love my country but we should learn from the bad stuff as well as the good.

reply

Indeed my friend .. don't hate .. but it's hard not to .. what our government did to the Indians is one of the most shameful things in our history .. right up there with slavery .. One thing that I have learned is the Indians did everything they could do to stand by the treaties .. it was the US Government who broke them .. I am reading the book " Bury Me at Wounded Knee " this series goes right along with that book .. I learned there is a movie of the book also .. don't know if I could watch it , it's bad enough to read it .. it has broken my hearts many times in reading it .. Every country has bad things that happen .. and just as you have said .. " learn from it " .. peace .

reply

Just remember that not all of the white people back then disliked Native Americans. But I do think that there were many people that were scared of what they didnt know. Maybe that is why the whites preceded to do what they did. There were a great many things that happened that were indeed 'horrible' This I agree with. But Im not going to try and justify emotions or actions that took place back then. Meaning, that I was not around during that age in time.

reply

of course, redmaple it is not your fault what happened back in time. the thing is, though, that the injustice is still not over. many american indian communities still suffer from historic law making, broken treaties and so on.

reply

[deleted]

you didn't do it, I didn't do it, people that were taught, brought up and complelely believed natives werent humans did it, no use to hate yourself....... if we all thought that way about what our ancestors did in the past, we all would completely hate ourselves!

reply

"you didn't do it, I didn't do it, people that were taught, brought up and complelely believed natives werent humans did it, no use to hate yourself....... if we all thought that way about what our ancestors did in the past, we all would completely hate ourselves! "

Excellent point! I think we all have ancestors who did things we'd be ashamed of if we knew what they were involved in. What matters isn't what our ancestors did but what WE do from this point forward. It's the only thing we have control of and at this point in time the only thing that will make a difference. It's natural to feel guilt and shame when you find out what happened in the past. However guilt only serves a useful purpose when it motivates you to avoid that course and from here on out do the right thing. Once it's served that purpose it's time to let guilt go.

reply

excellent post, bittybell-1

reply

[deleted]

Candygirl, I don't think that all white people look down on foreigners and discriminate. I know that I don't. I find other cultures fascinating, and I volunteer as an ESL tutor for international students at the university. It's wrong to stereotype any group of people,including whites. There are other cultures who are just as ethnocentric as WASPs. What we must try to do is be accepting of all cultures, and embrace the differences. If we do, it will be a much better world.

reply

[deleted]

Thats a good quality to have, candy...

reply

Candygirl, I think that if people could look at every person as an individual, and not as part of a group, it would be a positive move. Putting labels on groups of people, and stereotyping is just not right. It's wrong to stereotype by race, gender, economic background, religion,etc. It's much better to just see each person as an individual, and get to know them on that basis.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

"The thing is, you cannot judge a race. Any man who judges by the group is a pea-wit." --- Kevin Conway as Sergeant Buster Kilrain in "Gettysburg."

I think, as we grow more multi-cultural, that each succeeding generation becomes a little less prejudiced than the last - but it it still a long way from harmonious. In general, prejudice comes from environment, usually passed on from parents to children. Some offspring eventually make their own minds up and disown their parents' ignorance (and I'm sure there are cases where children of open-minded parents somehow develop their own prejudices anyway.) But environment is the biggest contributor.

An example - my sister married a man from Mexico. They live in the city (Chicago) and my niece has gone to multi-ethnic, multi-cultural schools (she's going into her junior year in high school.) She also is a member of the Chicago Children's Choir, which is as diverse a body as you can find on this earth. Among her crowd, the concept of race is, literally, non-existent - these kids don't ever take it into account when forming friendships, dating, working together on school projects, etc. It is a microcosm of how the world SHOULD be, ideally.

Our family was raised in a predominantly white, middle class suburb. While our parents instilled good racial (or non-racial, if you want to put it that way) outlooks in us, I know many people who, to this day, harbor strong prejudices. And there is absolutely no way to change their minds no matter how hard you try. Incidentally, I am almost the same age as those whose apalling conduct you mentioned (actually a little older, 43 to be precise.) While I don't know anyone who's done anything quite that vile (assuming the story is true; since you're getting it second-hand there is probably a possibility that it it false)
I know people who think that way.

The solution, as I sort of mentioned earlier, is time. As each suceeding generation deals with a little more mixture, the old prejudices get chipped away. My aforementioned childhood white-bred suburb, in which for 18 years I knew of one or two black residents and a handful of hispanic and arabic people, is a kaleidoscope of diversity now (at least comparatively. It still ain't the city.) The way to beat this, I think, is to get the different races together as children. In the late 80's one of my brothers and his family moved back here from Arizona, and for eight years lived in my mom's house (the one I grew up in) until they bought their own. The houses on both sides of mom's are rented out. When my oldest nephew (now 20) was about 4, a Japanese family rented one of the houses. It was great to see my nephew and two little Japanese kids, who didn't even speak the same language, playing together and having a grand time of it. That's what you do. If, somehow, you promote diversity in children's groups, prejudice as we know it will continually decrease. At the current rate it may take tens or even hundreds of generatons to get where we really should be, if ever, but it's worth a shot.

"The good die young - but pricks live forEVER!" --- Lewis Black

reply

[deleted]

word ON THX_1139 !! u'r the man ! !! !!!
1 problem splat99, we dont have that much time. planets resources are depliting. population is growing, and geting inlightend very slow }-:

i think we gona hit bottom soon. but people, "horrible people" are aware of this,and they dont wont to hit the bottom, and they have the meens to deal with this problem. i am talking about black projects, secrete above top secrete. everything ells is just a play ground. every issu that rises is just like they trhwoing a toy in to our sand box only to accupy us more and hold in the sand box.

it's a pity i wont stay to see the world crumble

reply

[deleted]

But being in a multi-cultural area doesn't always fix the problem. I have two cousins that are cops. One works in a predominantly Hispanic neighborhood, the other in an African-American neighborhood. Because these two see the worst elements day after day, they have developed prejudices against whatever race they work with. Is that right? No. But it is, unfortunately, understandable.

Human beings, as a whole, deal with things in absolutes. White or black. Good or evil. Right or wrong. Only a select few can actualy deal with life in the gray areas. Because the middle ground, compromising, shades of gray are hard. They're complicated, not simple. Most people know the middle road exists, but many choose to ignore it.

Human beings also tend to become extremists. They lean so far one way, until they realize how bad they've become. Then, they start leaning the other way, until it, too, becomes bad. Just look at the person who wrote the first post in this thread. "I hate our people." Why? Because s/he watched a historical mini-series about one side of what happened. Then, this person jumped to the conclusion that white Caucasian people are all bad and horrible.

Now, I did not watch this mini-series. I watched the previews, and I already knew what direction it was going to go in, views that I am, frankly, sick and tired of. I got a history major in school, and took several classes on the West and what happened to the Tribal Americans (my own term, dumb I know, but I *HATE* the term Native American, since it totally discounts every other person who was born here,) and I'm tired of Hollywood's nonsense. For a long time, the Tribal Americans were the bad guys who committed horrible atrocities against the poor settlers who were only trying to survive. In the last twenty years or so, we have a switch. Now the European Americans are the bad guys who committed horrible atrocities against the Tribal Americans. *rolls eyes* Guess what? Neither side is completely blameless. Both sides did some *INCREDIBLY* horrible things to one another. Continuing to show one side or the other as the bad guys is *NOT* going to help.

There were heroes and villains on both sides. Bottom line: they were all just people, who did what they believed they had to to survive. Right, wrong, good, bad, they did what they thought they needed to. They also refused to see one another as human beings. They believed differences were wrong and something to be feared.

We have come some distance from that attitude. We still have a long way to go, but we have made some progress. Now, we believe in a multi-cultural society, where we attempt to celebrate differences. We do need to remember the past, so we don't repeat it. But we do not have to share in the guilt of the past, and I refuse to. *I* didn't do those things. I may have had ancestors who did. I don't know. But I know *I* didn't. I also don't have prejudices against people who are different from me. But I don't think my country is the worst in the world. It does not have the worst history, nor does it have the worst present in the world.

For those people who want to revile their whole ancestry and history, just think about this: If history had not fallen in the way it had, would you even be here, the way you are, today? Would you be willing to give up your existence, the existence of your entire family, your friends, and your friends' families, to take it back? And keep this in mind, ladies and gentleman, without Europeans, and yes, that includes the Spanish, the Tribal Americans would have never had horses. The two American continents would look *VERY* different without the European invasion...and I'm not sure they would be all that much better, if they were better at all. After all, the Aztecs practiced human sacrifice. There were also many warrior tribes who enslaved one another. And at the same time the pioneers were encroaching on their lands, the tribes were still busy fighting each other. They could never band together successfully for a long enough period of time to present a united front to the pioneers.

I said a lot more than I intended to, but even so...*shrugs*

"He who dies with the most toys is still dead."

reply

"Both sides did some *INCREDIBLY* horrible things to one another. Continuing to show one side or the other as the bad guys is *NOT* going to help. "

Yeah...it's political correctness run amuck.

reply

Great point. mizbara
It reminds me my professor of Ethnic Study in my university. He is a Tribal American from S. California. He tells many harsh environment and lack of resources of his people, such as high crime rate, and evil cops

However, sometimes I don't always agree with his opinions (For instance, he justifies Japanese army in WWII, however, I am Taiwanese and my grandpa fought against Japanese army during their invasion of Asian countries. Even though I do sympathize the victims of Nukes in Japan, there are a lot of Asians who are slaughtered during WWII and Western world never cared since they are not important)Therefore, he sometimes pissed me off.

Once he talked about illegal immigrants from Middle and Southern American, he satired that "Oh, Latin illegal immigrants come to the US because they need to survive...unlike Chinese or Taiwanese, who come here with their money. Nobody will discriminate against them" in his class. Unlike what he said, there are many poor asians as well as Native Americans. My pastor usually preach to poor Chinese immigrants in the farm in Bakersfield. Most of of immigrants only tried to find a job here, and they do suffered from discrimination since Americans stereotypes Asian who does not have too much voice. So does many poor black/white/Middle Eastern people.

Even though I really sympathize the situation of tribal people, as well as other people who have harsh time in the US, and I hope to help them, I hate anyone like my professor who only tells one side of story about ethnicity.

reply

Splat99,

The thing is, you cannot judge a race. Any man who judges by the group is a pea-wit." --- Kevin Conway as Sergeant Buster Kilrain in "Gettysburg."

Wow that is my favourite quote of all time when it comes to talking about race relations. I totally agree with what you say about prejudice being stamped out over a long time through multiculturalism ... but of course if I was a member of a minority race I'm sure I'd be asking how long do I really have to wait?

I think most of us, posting here, pretty much agree that while those of us who had white ancestors that came to North America and settled these lands did so at the expense of others ... of course I think I would be hard put not to find a historic case for any kind of people (or animals for that matter)who at some time or another didn't do the same in Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia or South America ...

But for some reasons there still remains a great deal of the Native population that .... well I'm sorry I don't know really how to put this into the proper words ... but certainly THX, and other, above have illustrated that something is amiss many long years after the "westward expansion" ... Others far more articulate and closer to the problem can likely explain it better ... but based upon my experience with the Natives ("Aboriginal Peoples" is the official term apparently now) I know that there is "something wrong" ... For example in Canada natives, as a percentage, are overrepresented among our prison population much like the black population is in the United States ... but it seems more than just simple economics ...
See - http://www.brandonu.ca/native/cjns/16.1/Cattarinich.pdf

I know that Native concerns and issues here, in Canada, are in some ways similar to those in the United States but I also would not be surprised if that some of them are based on the ways we dealt with the Natives in the past.

I note that someone said we can't apply our 21st century thinking to the past ... perhaps ... but we do need to understand the past if we are to help the Native population face the future ... for the most part any solutions to Native problems in all likelihood will in the end will have to come from them themselves with any support or help, of course, that mainstream society can offer them.

"I"m Gilbert Smythe ... bite me!"

reply

I think sometimes living in a small town or place with a small population is kind of like living in a fishbowl- people sometimes forget that there is a world out there that can be entirely different and be just as acceptable as their own point of view.

reply

Every country has atrocities in its past. We can only try to learn from the mistakes of a bygone age. Hating people who are a hundred years dead will do nothing to help anyone. If we dwell on the sins of the past then we will find shame in every country.

"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." - Phillip K. Dick

reply

[deleted]

Excellent post joleofmichigan I completely agree with you

reply

I don't find your post all that offensive but you need to hear why.

I believe that you did do some amount of research to come to your current understanding of what went on back then, but your material and your interpretations were grossly misguided.

I'm glad that you no longer feel guilt for being white, as you had nothing to do with the genocide that took place and feeling guilt towards your own culture is something that I would not want to experience......but you'd best believe that the "whites" did commit the worst atrocities not just in the U.S. and North America but they make a fairly convincing bid for the world title with what happened to our people. Estimates (which sadly is all we'll ever have) put the number as high as 95% of our population was wiped out due to warfare, disease and famine that was put upon us by the "settlers". The one point I'm willing to bend on here is disease 'cause hey, *beep* happens, but even then I will only bend so far as there are documented accounts of possesions of the sick being given to native tribes with hopes of spreading the disease. Famine was a direct result of overhunting done by the white man and warfare, well we've all heard the horror stories.

I also don't like how you've taken one of the most sacred rituals (o-kee-pa, only I've only ever known it by another name) in our traditions and put such a negative spin on it ("morbid fantasies") and then used it to make yourself feel better about what white people did to our people. You're continuing to degrade our culture with that statement, and for that you should be ashamed.

I can't really comment on your third statement as I have little to no experience with the topic, but I do find it to be quite ignorant and insensitive to the African American plight.

Please continue to do research and dive deeper into these matters before writing them off as you have.
You can start with two book's that I've read and found them to be extremely well written, using actual documentation gathered from the days of when this was actually going on. The books are;

Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee by Dee Brown and,
A Little Matter of Genocide: Holocaust and Denial in the Americas 1492 to Present by Ward Churchill

Thanks and feel free to reply.

We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.

reply

humans can only be human.

reply

[deleted]

joleofmichigan,

whow, first i have to take some deep breath after reading your statement! Are you for real. you are the best example of white ignorance, you are the reason that i am sometimes ashamed of my skincolor ( i am white, too).

first, when the europeans landed on the american coast, they did not encounter primitive cultures. the cultures had a perfect understanding of their surroundings, which topped the understanding of the europeans in many cases. you critique the cultural practices of the american indians with even great ignorance. only because their customs do not fit within the tight limits of your western trained mind does not mean that they are babaric. the tribes of the americas acted as they did because it fit into their relationship with nature. we westerners lost the understanding and relationship with nature, and this will be our downfall.

people like you continue the colonization. people like you are the problem because as long as such thinking exists there will never be equality within the United States.

I am so mad and sad to read your uneducated statement!

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

it is not just about different ideas. it is about racism and the damage colonialism does to cultures.

reply

ahhh you dont get the point RollerKate88.

if some 1 would kill your entire family, you would wont to revenge !
you would remember it for your entire life, you would tell the history to your kids so they'l remember and tell their future kids !
im not gona get in to the point of this all, and human nature, but this is how you would feel. and this is how they felt.
this is what was passed to their kids.
todays indians dont wona kill you or revenge what happened back then, but this is somthing you allways remember.
this history must constently be reminded, otherwise it's like not saying to your child what you did is wrong !

every new geniration that is born, like you for example thinks: i am new spawn, what hapened then got nothing to do with me im neutral it's all equal.

well it's NOT ! the Balance has been shifted !

and im russian 22 y.o., got nothing to do with indians, didnt saw many movies on this topic, didnt listen to any propaganda about the topic, so im pretty objective.
i just abale to look from a side on the matter.

there are constant energy drafts in our world.

it's a pity i wont stay to see the world crumble, you jedi scum!

reply

I don't think that you realize that there were two different cultures here, who had no knowledge of each other to this point. Therefore you cannot simply rely on European outlooks, as they do not understand the culture (most of the time). Yes, the Europeans did view some of the Native culture as "morbid fantasies," but how do you think the Natives felt about European practices? All I'm trying to say is try looking at it from outside of your normal cultural perspective, and view it from Native shoes. This was the source of many of the problems between the Natives and the whites. This is especially so with the English, who only saw the Natives as being in the way of their progress. The French were a little better in this respect, learning the culture and sometimes being incorporated into it. However, the French were certainly no saints.

Also, your thoughts on slavery, I would argue that it started out of the lack of available labor or slaves in the new world. The Indians died quickly from disease, as the whites also did. Meanwhile the Africans were from the same latitude and therebye could handle the weather and disease much better, at least they thought. I would say that cultural superiority played a minor role in the beginning, and grew after the importation to the new world in order to hold them down. However, the lack of labor was the major initial impetus. No matter why the institution of slavery was established it certainly was a dark point in US history, which forever changed the history of the US.

reply

"technologically, governmentally superior culture."

Yes, what would us savages have done without the enlightenment of white christianity to teach us the evil of our ways. How would we ever have survived without the rifle, the train, and alcohol, Technology was integral in the mindless slaughter of the buffalo by these superior cultures.

How would we have ever survived without the disease riddled superior culture that came and eradicated us.

The self righteousness of white society and christianity never ceases to amaze me. It hasn't stopped either. There's no point speaking to most people about any of this because they've been convinced that christianity is the one and only true faith. Read Russel Means book, "Where white men fear to tread" and you'll see that it didn't end in the 19th or even the 20th century.

Nobody is going to convince Americans or Canadians or any white society that anyone living in a non-christian society is anything but savages who just need to see the light.

Hate yourself all you want, it's not going to change anything. Do something. Make a change. That will be productive.

reply

kidlogic, i agree with you. the western world will always think that they have the right way. i am not native american myself, but i realize that there is not just one answer. it is definetly clear that christianity does not hold the whole truth.
for sure, the europeans were extremely ignorant comming to this new continent,and i agree, sadly, that still white america tries to further colonize.

reply

The topic starter could just be being sarcastic too.

reply

[deleted]

Only if he really means it.

But did it ever occur to you that he may have started this thread just to get us thinking in the wrong direction?

reply

ok just to say this. I am a professor at the university of Clemson, SC. i dont think you can base "hating ourselfs" off of one movie let alone a movie. movies never tell the whole truth. if they did it wouldnt be called a movie more like a documentary. if your gonna base anything go to school for a few years, do some study programs with diffderent tribes. for instance i lived with the Cherokee for 3 years, the Algoquian for 6 months, Choctaw for 1 year, and the Creek for 5 years 6 months. there is a lot of shame on both sides more than you would belive. for instance General Sherman of the US military wrote to Grant and said, "The Sioux must feel the superior power of the Government." Sherman vowed to remain in the West till the Indians are all killed or taken to a country where they can be watched."

or

1862 - As many as 800 settlers killed in uprising of Santee Sioux. also only 7 NA's were wounded NO ONE KILLED


so next time you open your mouth try and do a little research before you say something.

reply

[deleted]

you should never hate, but learn. there are bad people everywhere no matter sex or race. if we could only learn from the mistakes made then we could prosper. however we seem to be a very ignorent nation as this type of treatment still goes on today in every race. we can feel sorry for what we see happing everyday but until we stand up for what we know is wrong treatment nothing will ever change. i agree with ishqkaminaa, there is no pure blooded people out their. we are all a mix of something. i am proud to be half irish and half german. yes bad things happen but to truly fix them we have to learn from them so it NEVER HAPPENS AGAIN.

reply

but why were the 800 settlers killed?! they were killed because they wanted to take over the homeland of the Native Americans. they killed the white settlers in defense for their own families. you are right, mostly there are two side to everything, but to be honest. i don't think these two sides are equal. the white people came to take over the land. the native americans defendet it. i think there is a difference.

reply

Okay there professor...and I believe you are a professor about as much as I believe you lived this Kevin Costner fantasy you describe, among us savages.

Before you open your mouth and spew out more of your uneducated facts, keep in mind that your knowledge comes from an educational system that still refuses to acknowledge most of what it did to my people. In short, white schools do not teach the truth about us or what was done to us.

The Santee Sioux uprising that you have no facts about, was the result of US Government agents stealing the Santee's treaty annuity money, which resulted in widespread starvation and death on the Santee reservation.
These same agents of the US govt, were also stealing and then selling all the supplies from shipments bound for the reservation, to the settlers in Mankato.
President Lincoln then ordered the execution of 38 Santee men who were picked at random from the reservation, never given any kind of trial or hearing, and were hanged in Mankato in front of the very people who had been living off of the Santee's money and supplies and caused the whole uprising in the first place. Lincoln never even inquired as to the reason for the uprising before he ordered the executions.

Take Thanksgiving for instance. The governor of the new colony at Plymouth proclaimed a feast of thanks for his militia after they had just returned from butchering an entire village of unarmed Wampanoag men, women and children AND he encouraged other colonies to do likewise. That is the feast you still celebrate today, as a national holiday.

The concessions at the National Park where Mount Rushmore is, right up into the 90's were still selling postcards that showed the massacre at Wounded Knee, and cavalrymen standing around piled up bodies of murdered Indians, smiling for the camera. Postcards of dead Indians! Imagine the reaction if someone sold postcards from Aushwitz or Dachau???

George Washington's "famous" crossing of the Delaware was only possible because he had a Seneca woman seated in the bow of the boat, guiding him across. Also, his armies would have frozen to death and starved had it not been for the Seneca feeding and clothing them during the winter. Washington also made a name for himself attacking Indian villages and burning their houses down, then killing the fleeing women and children mercilessly.

Thomas Jefferson wrote into the Declaration of Independence, "the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfareis an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes, and conditions"

Then, how about "The Trail of Tears?" Mr. Professor?

The Cherokee Nation was invaded and broken by the US Govt and forced at riflepoint to march out of their homeland. Randy Golden wrote about this: " In May, 1838, the forcible eviction of the Cherokee Nation began. Government troops under the command of Winfield Scott, at times supported by the brutal Georgia Guard, moved across the state taking the helpless Cherokee from their homes. Within two weeks every Cherokee in North Georgia, Tennessee, and Alabama had been captured, killed, overlooked or fled. Holding areas contained the Cherokee until they could be moved to one of the specially constructed forts further north."

4000 Cherokee men, women and children died on that forced march of 1000 miles from Rattlesnake Springs Tennesee, to Oklahoma under the supervision of the US army.

I have only scratched the surface here, Mr. Know-it-all. What was done to my people was unforgivable and unfortunately its people like you who trivialize it by saying such idiotic things like, "Well, you would still be living in tipi's and wearing skins if it weren't for us"

Yes, we would; and what a wonderful place this would still be.

reply

kidlogic,

Excellent post. Keep up the good work.




"So make way for the bad guy." - Tony Montana

reply

"President Lincoln then ordered the execution of 38 Santee men who were picked at random from the reservation, never given any kind of trial or hearing, and were hanged in Mankato in front of the very people who had been living off of the Santee's money and supplies and caused the whole uprising in the first place. Lincoln never even inquired as to the reason for the uprising before he ordered the executions."


This is incorrect. 393 Dakota men were tried and 323 convicted, with 303 sentenced to hang. President Lincoln actually demanded, against advice of General John Pope (the officer in charge of the trials), to personally review the record of each convicted man. This he did, and consequently vacated the death sentences of all but 39 men. One more was reprieved at the last minute by new evidence of his innocence, and the remaining 38 were sent to the gallows on December 28, 1862 at Mankato, Minnesota. This was the largest mass execution in U.S. history.

How do I know so much about this? My gr gr great grandfather's brother was Baptiste Campbell, a mixed blood Dakota who was one of the 38.

Anpetu was'te.

reply

"1862 - As many as 800 settlers killed in uprising of Santee Sioux. also only 7 NA's were wounded NO ONE KILLED
so next time you open your mouth try and do a little research before you say something."


Actually, the casualties for the Dakota Conflict of 1862 numbered approximately 500 settlers killed and 60 Dakota. An additional 38 Dakota men were hanged at Mankato in December, plus others lynched and killed by angry settlers.

reply