NO SINGING


If this movie had been presented as straight horror drama without the singing it would have been a lot better.

reply

This movie was based on the Broadway musical by Hugh Wheeler and Stephen Sondheim.

reply

Yes, but the music in the film was done SO badly that I agree with kenburke. It would have been better to present is as a dark-humored horror film.

reply

I do agree that the music was really lacking when you compare it to the Broadway musical. They cut way too much for my taste.

reply

They cut to much, and did a bad job with the music that was kept on. I mean, "Try A Little Priest" is the funniest, bounciest, rollicking, audience-pleasing number ever written about murder... and it totally fell flat on film!


Tim Burton just isn't good at musicals. He would have done much better if he'd played to his own strengths and presented a horror comedy without music. Other versions of the story have been done without music, Burton could have made the best one if he'd had a clue.

reply

"He would have done much better if he'd played to his own strengths and presented a horror comedy without music."

That, or hire a musical director and focus on just directing the scenes with dialogue - and if he has to be involved in musical numbers, focus on showing the actors how best to embody the lyrics and character motivations in the song, rather than musical performance itself. I thought his vision and his style was perfect for the atmosphere of Sweeney Todd, but he needed to also hire someone to work with who had experience with musicals.

reply

Maybe he should have hired actors who could sing along with a musical director who could put it all together properly. Sasha Baron Cohen and the young boy did quite well.

reply

I agree, musical's work on stage. The horror community doesn't want a bunch of singing, it ruins suspense and atmosphere.

reply

Tim Burton could have made a really great horror or comedy-horror version of the Sweeney Todd story, that's true. I did enjoy the musical version he did come up with, quite a bit, even though I'm not the biggest musical fan.

Now, all that aside, I find the critique weird. It's akin to saying, "I was really looking forward to the fish-out-of-water dramedy about the blue collar cop crashing his ex's highbrow Christmas party, but they had to put in all this gunfighting and terrorism stuff!" as a critique of Die Hard. Yes, there is a good movie to be made where the farce happens, but that's not the movie they made.

It seems odd to me to criticize a movie for not being what you wanted it to be. Not being good, sure. Not being entertaining, okay. Being mindless drivel, yeah. Or not living up to its own goals: abso-freaking-lutely. But it wasn't trying to be a straight-up horror drama; it was a musical. Why criticize it for what is (essentially) the premise?

reply

Not at all. It worked great.

reply