MovieChat Forums > Dirty Deeds (2006) Discussion > How did this get a PG13?

How did this get a PG13?

posted 16 years ago by TheRockerGuy
8 replies | jump to latest

there are so many boob shots, im not complaining, but wow

[–] 16 years ago

[deleted]

[–] mariposa0283 16 years ago

i dont remember any boob shots

but ive only seen the version on the movie channels

[–] clubxchild07 16 years ago

Did Milo have any nude shots in either version?

[–] mariposa0283 15 years ago

not on the movie channel version.. doubtful even on an unrated dvd. if ya wanna see his peen just google it im sure someone somewhere has plastered his face on some porn stars body... hell photoshop is so pro that you cant even tell its not his body lol so you can just pretend its really his wang and fap fap fap your little heart out

[–] moiseshn 15 years ago

I wouldn't take my kids teenagers to watch this movie if there's a single one second scene of boobs. It should be rated R and not PG-13.

[–] timoth93 15 years ago

tml ohare

I wouldn't take my kids teenagers to watch this movie if there's a single one second scene of boobs. It should be rated R and not PG-13.
.......................................................................

whoa your a bit of a tightass. you think its wrong for someone who has hit pubity to see one second of tits. its not like it'd destroy their lives forever and it's pretty likely that they have seen that before.

[–] MrsFarhanAkhtar 15 years ago

the movie channel version is edited (obviously)...hence, nom boob shots
the dvd and the theatre version are obviously unedited, so yes, it is strange that this movie got a PG13 rating, but its ur choice to see it.
And no, Milo Ventimiglia has no nude shots in either versions. There are only these nude girl shots (unnecessary ones but still).

[–] agnew12 13 years ago

The one with all the nudity is the unrated version