Annoyingly Confusing


I'm sure the filmmakers meant well, and this picture has decided strengths: splendid acting, gorgeous photography, pleasantly appropriate set design, moody, atmospheric sound.

One problem I have with it is it's relentless good taste. All these polite, pleasant, yet cold people who you just know have never and never will laugh, embrace, fart, or do anything that normal human beings do. By the end, I was so awash in pastel genteelity I wanted to throw up.

But apart from that, it's almost literally impossible to understand what's going on most of the time. Divergent timelines that we have to take as running in the *same* time frame, in areas that are hundreds of miles apart, but which look identical, a whole gaggle of characters that share similar experiences and who even resemble each other physically to an extent, some may be or may not be adopted, etc., back to the future, who's on first? Please!

David O Selznick once said to prospective filmmakers that the worst thing you can do is to *confuse* your audience.
Still good advice.

reply

I think here you'll find people(like me) who agree with you and people who disagree very much. Maybe I keep visiting this board because I try to understand why so many people love this movie so much. To me, this movie is a good effort for a beginner, but it leaves me cold. I don't emotionally connect with any of the characters. I saw it mainly for Tess Harper and Bonnie Hunt, but there seems to be a lot of Kip fans here (I never heard of him before).

reply

You're right -- I didn't understand the shifting timelines myself until I read some of the comments here. The part about Mark having died and then seeing him walking on the roadside later was baffling. Now it makes sense, so the director did fail if so many of us were confused.

reply