MovieChat Forums > Little Children (2007) Discussion > The part that tests your morals

The part that tests your morals


The part that made me really think was when Ronnie attempted to castrate himself. Earlier in the movie, when the one woman said he should be castrated, I thought that was silly/cruel just like Kate Winslet did. But, after seeing Ronnie's perverted behavior on his date and the way he threatened her... picturing him doing that around kids... when I saw he actually HAD castrated himself, I felt sort of... relieved. I knew it was bad to feel relieved at such pain, but since he'd done it to himself, I felt glad he wouldn't be able to act like that towards others again. If someone else had done it to him, that would be horrible of course. But the fact that he did it on his own made it feel a little more reasonable.

How did everyone else feel at this part?

reply

Well,it IS a test of morals and it seems to divide the audience. I feel that when he makes this attempt at trying to interact with another human being and maybe as a bit of a plot device(That this sweet,vulnerable woman also had been victimized),he is both scarring her and ripping up old wounds but that´s the trigger,maybe not the motive....though I doubt he Ever would harm her physically.


A part of me feels like this was done cause Ronnie struggled with keeping up his facade during the date,trying to pass off as normal. As soon as she mentioned likely having been abused as a child,that triggered his psychosexual disturbance but he acted on it as to scare her away for good. Ronnie couldn´t interact with other adults,he couldn´t see the middleground and I think he did it in selfloathing,as in;This is what I am,a sick creep,relly damaged goods....


I think for respect and love for his mother,both when alive and in death,he wanted to be good. He would always have these urges,for moms sake he would never act on them,thus sexuality would be a existing and present dimension of his person,his sexual existence would always be torment but for mommy it was worth it....so he castrated himself,both to "Be a good boy" as his mother wanted him to be but maybe also,without her around,to guide him and keep him out of trouble,he didn´t trust himself and removed himself or...A PART of himself from the equation. I got no relief or joy from his self-mutilation, though...one I expected to have to a great extent.

He was despicable...and tragic and very damaged. I still feel like he shouldn´t have done it,I would rather see him get real,professional help and deal with his demons then castrating himself. I felt or WANTED to believe he could overcome his pervertions But that´s just me and sometimes i am naive...

reply

For me, there was no test at all. He was right to castrate himself and if there was any justice in the world, this would be a mandatory punishment for all proven child molesters.

I’m not entirely sure how or why you found the castration comment by the playground mum to be cruel. I’m not sure how anyone could find it anything other than just. Personally, I was a little disgusted when the film seemed to try and position me against the woman (through Winslet’s dialogue) when she said he should be castrated. Especially when all psychological science points to the fact that pedophiles can never be reformed.

reply