*sighs* let's just clear stuff up.
WHY YU-GI-OH IS NOT FOR LITTLE KIDS:
1) Violence
2) Porn or sexual implication
3) Occasional cussing, but all anime has that and it's not really "cussing" in Japanese.
1) Violence: How many children's shows do you know in which the main character plays the "Kill you opponent with only one finger" game? Or the main character uses a 20,000 volt stun gun on gang members, plays Flammable Spray-Paint tag, plays Explosive-in-a-Test-Tube-wedged-in-a-puck-of-ice-over-a-hot-griddle table hockey? The fact that Yuugi actually psychologically traumatizes, severely maims, and even KILLS people without batting an eye kinda shows that the 8-12 audience is NOT the ones who should watch this. Of course, these examples are all from the original series, which I will admit was infinitely times better than Duel Monsters. But even Duel Monsters isn't for little kids; many of the duels are life and death (i.e. if you lose, we'll cut your ankles off with a spinning circular saw, you'll fall 20 stories to your death, we'll tie a cannonball to you and stick you in the ocean, etc.) 8-12...I don't think so.
2) Porn: Yuugi and Jonouchi are UBER PERVs. They trade porn videos with each other, and it's hilarious to see Yuugi's eager, excited face when he gets a new one. Anzu's fan service; so is Mai... even the Duel Monsters are fan service because like HALF THE FREAKING FEMALE CARDS (ok, more like 10%) are nude or very close to it.
3) Not really worth addressing. I mean, "Kuso" usually translates as "*beep*" but it's more of a "dammit" anyway.
As for ripoffs...Yu-Gi-Oh came first. And Tajiri Satoshi has had his idea for Pokemon since he was a little kid. If we want to say anything about ripping off, say that YGO ripped off Magic. Cuz Magic and Wizards was actually a PARODY of Magic, but the stupid then-fans liked it too much.
Besides, if you think that something ripped something else off because they're similar in any way (i.e Monsters and battling=ripped off) you have another thing coming. Monsters and battling has been around since ancient times, with weirdness in old mythology and crap. Just because two things are similar do not mean they were ripped off--if there was a ripoff, there would be intense copyright battles. Anyhow, because ALL artists take ideas from others at some time because no one can be completely original. As long as differences exist, there will ALWAYS be similarities. My suggestion: quit being so blind yourself and get that through your head, or you'll end up looking stupid. With that kind of outlook, EVERYTHING looks like it ripped off EVERYTHING else. Picasso ripped off ancient Egyptian art because both purposely decided to abstract the human form. Riiiiiiiiiight.
Pay attention in your high school humanities classes.
reply
share