A few reasons why this film bombed so badly
I found this to be a good and enjoyable film, but it really bombed in the US Box Office. I think there are a few reasons why:
(1) Rich Man problems The lead character is ridiculously wealthy, and is conflicted about if he should retire from his investment job to a beautiful chateau in Southern France. Seriously? That's the "conflict" of this film? This is something rich people or people heading toward retirement can get into - whether it's time to retire and enjoy "The good life." But for the average person, this is not a very compelling story
(2) The Lady --- Attractive, engaging, charming, fiery, stubborn, but someone who seems very promiscuous and attainable. Actually, she has a lot of baggage, and it always seems like he can have her if he wants to stay, so there's no real suspense or story there, just a matter of how it will play out. It's a common female fantasy - man quits career and moves primarily to be with you, but it doesn't ring true here.
(3) A movie in Europe with an Australian lead making lazy stereotypes about US Tourists. US Tourists have a bad reputation, as do Russian, German, and particularly British Tourists. (and a host of others) They stereotype everyone in this movie, including the French. So this shouldn't really be "offensive." But it comes across as a little too snobbish to many i've talked with, fitting in with the "rich man problems" already mentioned, and doesn't appeal to blue collar people.
Here is the truth: A segment of the elite class in the US has a fantasy about retiring to southern france and going into the wine business. For some, this is paradise. But this is not the average person's fantasy, and, with the above issues, this movie isn't really "in their wheelhouse"
Anyone agree?