MovieChat Forums > A Good Year (2006) Discussion > Hugh Grant or Colin Firth would've been ...

Hugh Grant or Colin Firth would've been best


instead of Crowe!

It had to be you-ARSENAL

reply

Colin Firth and Hugh Grant would have played the character differently, but I was surprised at how well Russell Crowe handled this romantic comedy, SO different from his usual far more dramatic work. He did do a comedy before that I know of, Mystery, Alaska. He's quite versatile!

reply

Actually, as much as I like Colin Firth, I highly enjoyed Russel Crowe in this! Like you, bonnie_j, I was quite impressed by his performance. He broke away from his usual dramatic roles, and it was a nice change.

"Don't care what people say. Don't give a damn about their laws." Édith Piaf

reply

I was thinking that during the tennis scene - "I wonder if they tried to get Hugh Grant for this role?" He's certainly good at playing likeable *beep*

reply

Hugh Grant plays too cute. Crowe gave a far stronger and more interesting performance than Grant ever has or could.

reply

Frank Z...agree with you completely.

reply

Frank Z I also second that :) ..He was a real surprise actingwise , specially the Tennis Scene & the Victory dance ;)...Cuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuute yet naughty

reply

No way - this wasn't a romantic comedy - Russell Crowe played this perfectly.

reply

Hugh Grant has done some excellent dramatic roles. While I liked Crowe's rendition, Grant could've done the role well also.

reply

Russell is fantastic in this film, too! He shows aspects of him that you don´t usually see in other films. And he is very cute,too!

reply

uhmm... no

reply

[deleted]

Another actor - different movie.

reply

I was really impressed with Crowe in this film, he gave it some edge. Firth and Grant would have been far too wet for this part. Crowe has a natural arrogance and cockyness that the type of person he was portraying often display.

reply

Firth can play arrogant and cocky. He plays D'arcy and Valmont for crissakes, lol.

Grant can play it also. He was that jerk in Bridget Jones.

Having said that, Crowe was a joy to watch in this. I don't think either of those guys would have been better even though they would have been good.

"What happens to a dream deferred?"

reply

Hugh Grant would have turned the film into "just another Hugh Grant movie". I think Crowe did an excellent job. He broke away from his usual role and delivered a great performance. Russel gave the film a hilarious but slightly serious tone that Hugh Grant cannot.

"But the good news is; the whiskey works." -Bob, Lost In Translation

reply

[deleted]