MovieChat Forums > Meltdown (2004) Discussion > Notes From a Crew Member

Notes From a Crew Member


I worked on "Meltdown" 17 out of the 21 filming days this past March and thought I might add some back-story to comments made re: the camera style of the production. The "24" look of the film was, of course, intentional. The rough edges, whip-pans, push-ins and over all news-style appearance was insisted upon by the director to the point of strict enforecement of two rules I've never encountered on any film set I've worked on before. 1. NO CAMERA TRACK TO BE LAID. NEVER! 2. NO FLOOR MARKS FOR THE ACTORS. Floor marks for camera we're tolerated but only barely. On one occaission, a stand-in attempted to use a candy wrapper as a temporary mark to hold his place during adjustments and this was promptly removed (with the toe of his boot) by the first assistant director.
One other interesting sidebar; there is no nuclear power plant in the Vancouver Canada area (where Meltdown was filmed) and even if there were, it's very unlikely it would be allowed for use as a film set. Instead, a sewage waste water treatment plant was utilized with cooling towers CGI'ed in post. Shooting days at the sewage plant we're,in fact, nights (dusk til dawn) so that meant two weeks of all nighters in the cold, wet, pacific northwest spring enduring a fragence comparable to a skunk getting a perm. At least it wasn't during the height of summer heat when, I'm told by plant workers, it's more like a DEAD skunk getting a perm.

reply

why no floor marks?

reply

I suppose to keep it looking as much like a continuing live news story as possible. I know that's not a very satisfactory explanation and it's purely speculative since it would never occur to any of us to question the director, director of photography or even the camera operator on why he wanted something done a certain way. It probably wouldn't result in your getting fired but it might make it difficult to get hired on the boss's next project. Besides, we all know actors never hit their marks anyway (well, most of them).

reply


Well, it made it look like it was made by some amateur, and huge grains in the pictures made it look like it was made on somebodies 20 year old video equipment.

Hopefully the amateur director won't get a job ever again.
--
Lets nuke the site from orbit - its the only way to be sure.

reply