@fireyhole and @miriclemaker22
Thanks. That's very useful.
And low standards? What about "Disaster Movie", "You kill me", "Balls of Fury", "The Comebacks", "Last Hour", "How to rob a bank", "Speed racer", "One missed call", "Prom night", "Captivity" - just to name a few. So, please don't begin with ridiculous comparisons of movie productions/moviegoers of a country.
Nothing to do with my wish to rate after(!) you see a movie. Nothing to do with Far Cry or any other Uwe Boll movie. I am not a fan and perhaps never will be - he won't be able to catch up to Fincher, R. Scott a.s.o.
Did you see "Far Cry"? Did you see any Boll-Movie? Or are you just assuming that because of his low ratings all his movies are crap without watching and seeing for yourself that it is crap?
I think the rating system has to be changed.
I've enough of crap like "I give Quantum of solace a 9 because i loved the trailer" or "Brad Pitt? He's so cool. Every movie of him deserves a 10". Or that you have to give the boring and dull and overrated "There will be blood" a good rating only because Day-Lewis busting his ass off in his role.
Most overrated movies of this year:
30. 8.6 WALL·E (2008) 78,201 (Same rating i.e. as "Citizen Kane"!!!!!!)
Damn, i love animation movies - and most of them are really good. Wall-E, too - but it deserves not more than a 7/10 because the story isn't as good as Nemo, or Rataouille or Monsters Inc.(which btw is the best animation movie)
235. 8.0 In Bruges (2008) 35,630 (Same rating i.e. as "The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance") Why an 8?? 6 or 7 is enough. The end spoiler was too obvious, the dialogues were reiterative.
You see, those movies aren't Uwe Boll movies.
If Wall-E was a Uwe Boll movie it would be *beep* which is fact.
Or you'd immediately give it a 1/10 without seeing it, which is what the original poster is saying. Wall-E could be the EXACT same movie, nothing different and would have a 2.8 if Boll's name was attached to it which is fact.
I'm not much of a fan of his but it's better than the overdone, moronic, mind-numbing spoofs that keep rolling out of Hollywood.
No, you see, I think he's justified in giving Boll a 1/10 without seeing that movie first. If he is like me and he has seen at least 5 of Bolls *beep* films, then you can pretty much guess how good the others are. He has only ever made *beep* films, he will only ever make *beep* films.
He's a blight on the creative world and I hope he has an aneurysm and dies.
I have to disagree. Postal was actually a pretty funny movie.
>No, you see, I think he's justified in giving <insert name here> a 1/10 without seeing that movie first.
anyone who thinks that should be shot at sight.
I'm very responsible, when ever something goes wrong they always say I'm responsible.
You got a point there, regarding the rating system. Its basically useless now that there are so many morons on imdb. Not that there are no bad movies that deserve a very low rating or excelent movies that deserve a 10... its just like you said. People rate a movie cause they dont "like" something about it.
Sometimes i ask myself how some of the people on imdb got offended so badly, by an actor or director, that they "hate" his gut to the death, just cause he made a crapy movie, or they didnt like the way how he made the movie, or whatever. What kind of childish behaveour is that?!
I always say, if you dont like DRAMA movies, DONT GO WATCH EM!!! If you dont like movies made by Uwe Boll, DONT GOT WATCH EM!!! Cause you obviously wont like them, but DONT judge a book from its cover alone!
full ack, and i found there will be blood boring, too
but never the less everyone has to admit, that boll is one of the bottom 10% directors.
türk her yerde türklüğünü belli edio a.q.
Your a douche man, there's lots of really bad movies that get done just because the producer owes somebody a favor or sometimes Hollywood wants a bomb its all manipulated and "speed racer" was a great movie just overshadowed and it bombed, Germany sucks at making movies for the most part, why do you think Hollywood is known world wide? Because they make the best movies in the world, period. Even though speed raced bombed its still better than any movie uwe boll could never, even in his deepest dreams think of making. I did like postal so I give him that one every other uwe boll movie has been easily under a 3 besides the Asian girls tit's in that one deleted scene from house of the dead, I give them a 5. w/e, yah?
"Germany sucks at making movies for the most part,why do you think Hollywood is known world wide?"
What a disappointing (standard American) statement. Hollywood is "known world wide" basically because the USA has the biggest domestic audience, and a government that sponsors the export of domestically produced movies. Simple economics, and nothing AT ALL to do with QUALITY. Oh, and add-in a domestic American population that (a) hates foreign movies, (so remakes them - usually badly) plus studios that cater for "the lowest common denominator." That results in rubbish quality movies that appeal to the largest number of morons. The USA is NOT short of Morons. They're short of money, credibility yes... but morons, no!
Just seen the movie, not great I must tell you.It deserves a 1 or 2 in other words sucked big time
I've had enough crap of people assuming that people rate movies on the way trailers are good or bad.
Give examples or just even at least one movie that has a really bad rating but is a really good movie, and maybe ill start listening to your crap.
I happen to think "in bruges" deserves the 8.0 ,
it was fantastic....."end spoiler"?..........whatever.....
The movie was better than I expected. 4/10