I have it, and there was definitely a lot of the movie where I had trouble relating at all, with some scattered moments where it hit closer to home. That said, I think I'm considered to be a relatively "minor" case so I think a lot of it just wasn't close to what I personally experience. I could still recognize that most of what was in the movie was basically realistic fundamentally.
That said, yeah, I think it really exaggerated in places. And while it did better than any other film I've seen or know of on the topic at, I did feel like there still wasn't enough variation maybe in the "types" portrayed and that all of them were still a little on the "extreme" side in certain areas. But I think that was probably hard to get around.
I did think the film had some more substantial issues too, which bugged me more than the portrayal. I thought it was a decent/generally good film, but there were serious pacing and development problems as far as the story and conflicts went, and I thought at times the movie was far too in love with its own sense of "quirkiness," like it was trying to be way too "indie comedy." Which was kind of a problem for the portrayal as well, since I think it sometimes presented the characters (however unintentionally) as these "wacky, quirky, funny" caricatures. Again though, it was a decent enough movie, and definitely better than any movie "officially" about autism that I've seen (Edward Scissorhands is by far my favorite, but of course that's not about it officially).
reply
share