MovieChat Forums > Dreamland (2007) Discussion > Super Smart and Risky Film Based On The ...

Super Smart and Risky Film Based On The Quatum Theory!


This film, is as far as I can tell, is based on the Quatum Theory. It is a very risky film because most people will reject the occurances in the fim as "impossible" or not making sense, BUT THEY DO!
Stay with me here and stay open minded.....I believe that these filmmakers are pushing on boundries.

The scientific material the film is based on is not widely known to the general public, actually this film is quite brave in attempting to approach a new paradigm based in the Quantum theory and I refer you to several media pieces that I had seen in advance of this film, the film "What The Bleep Do We Know" and Robert Lazar's website on antimatter propulsion: BobLazar.com

Here's a question I saw a person post about this fim:

"But what happened to the male lead when he got zapped with the alien energy? Somebody claimed that he was a DIS agent, but he only started acting suspicious AFTER that scene"

My answer: There is no "After" or Before, the male lead was always in both places, he can ONLY exist in both or all places at ALL times. Please be open minded here, this is not what we have been programed to believe and therefore your intention will be to reject this way of thinking, this way of being or this new paradigm.

Old Paradigms of science lead us to believe that one person, one atom, one neutron exist in
one place at "one time" when in fact in the Quantum Theory in has been proven that NO one element, atom or material that we "believe" to be solid, like a person, actually exist in one place at one time, in fact we and ALL things exist everywhere and there is no such thing as time, these are just mutually agreed patterns that "snap" back to an agreed position based on the patterns of the "intender" within you.

Another words Hitler in the film was existing in the moment the two leads were seeing him and he was also existing in 1936, which is happening at the SAME time that the couple was seeing him on the road.
This thinking is just WAY too far out for most people to even begin to grasp and they would rather
pick up a Latte at Starbucks and not think about it.

I could go on but I think with this general answer you will see that these filmmakers indulged, in my opinion, into a VERY new science in this film and it is going to leave many people scratching their heads. I give them a Big thumbs up in trying to push people out of old patternistic ways of thinking.

All I can say is watch "What the Bleep Do We know" if you want to have a better understanding of this film.

reply


Totally agree, i thought this film was good in that it did try to explore some other possibilities. Although I felt that they should have laid out more detail about the basis of how everything that is happening in the film is possible and the paradox of duality. The "what the bleep" film makes it easier to grasp and if you did not see that film first, this film is going to be a leap for most people. great that someone took a risk with this film anyhow-bored with the same old same old



"liquid oozes from every pore"...........

reply

I think you might have a too good impression about yourself. I bet you have no clue what QT is all about, just general(ly wrong) ideas.

Even with all the Quantum Theory stuff, the film barely makes any sense and has any plot.

But hey -- in Quantum Theory I guess sense and stupidity exist in the same time and the same place. I know this is too far out for normal reasoning people but this is the kind of movie this is ;-)

reply

The only person who has a "too good impression" about themselves is a person that feels the need to point it out in someone else. You might want to think about that a bit, if you really do, you won't respond.

reply

Weren't you the one that initiated a put down by demeaning folks that enjoy Starbucks? And now you are trying to turn it around and insinuate you haven't put anyone down?

And the what #uck is Hilter doing in Area 51 -- whether now and/or 1932??? Did I miss some kind of correlation with him and the father/daughter/brother?Why not Nero, Genghis, Napoleon, or dare I say it...OPRAH??? I said it in another post and I'll say it again, this movie's script and actors left much to be desired. The spittin' brother (Jonathan Breck) was the only believable one.

reply

[deleted]

Off-Topic: Quatum physicist - a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't even there.

reply

dark (room) and black (cat) dont have any sense for a blind man

reply

Well duuuuh! You just killed the joke by being a smart a$$. Thanks!

reply

[deleted]

I was with you until you mentioned "What the bleep do we know?" This pseudo-Documentary is nothing more than a propaganda film for a silly and potentially dangerous cult led By JZ Knight,(potentially dangerous to the followers and their wallets) a woman who "Supposedly" channels the spirit of an ancient Warlord named "Ramtha". This crapfest, I mean documentary was made by two of Ramtha's followers, twisting scientific theories to fit all the nonesense that Ramtha feeds his sheepople, I mean followers.) Many real scientists and phycisists have spoken against this pile of garbage and have said that most of what is said in this film is innacurate to say the least.

Bob Lazar is just old and tired fodder for conspiracy theorist. No proof, no photographs, no film, no video, no documentation, nothing. Just a really cool sci-fi story, and it falls into the "faith" pile, as in, "I need no proof to believe."

Besides that, you're right on the money! Take care and have a wonderful quantum day, now I have to go be two places at once ;p

reply

[deleted]

Hitler was never in Nevada, let alone ever in North America.

That boyfriend became a different person. That's a totally separate concept than being in 2 places or all over.

I don't think any physics say that objects just materialize, like that little girl.

reply

this theory might be a new sience but not new thinking and alothough people may think it is imposible allthings big small huhge and minute and including time all happen at once it is our perseption that changes like an argument all the time anoying never resolved but constant never changing but always differnt atoms nutrons lions cammels humans and yes even humans every chose thought action and so on for all things including the abouve and not excluding others ALL THE TIME IN AN INSTANT PHILBE ps some call it god we know we think we know then we realize

reply

Well guys, quantum theory is one thing. What OP is talking about is "quatum theory". That's an entirely different discussion which you obviously are not intelligent enough to follow.

This totally great and well made movie is based on the eclectic quatum theory. No one but the director and writers know what that means.

reply