I maintain that this film is IMPOSSIBLE to understand on the first viewing.
As I replied to joe_bananas73 I disagree with that opinion. In fact I think if you discussed with people, you would see that most people understand the plot and the interactions of the characters in this film after only one viewing just as most films are understood after one viewing.
If anyone can claim that they completely understood it first time without having to rewind the movie about a dozen times then you deserve the Nobel Prize.
I suppose that depends on what you mean by "completely understood". If it requires that you can recreate all the timelines, both explicit and implied, then no one has ever or can ever completely understand this movie since the film does not provide all those details neccessary to recreate every timeline. This can be said of many films, all details are never provided in the film, only enough details to understand the film are put in.
I still don't quite understand all of it but after over an hour's research into the storyline after watching it, I think I managed to figure most of it out
But we are not meant to understand the film in this kind of detail. The viewers can NEVER understand all the detail (and are not meant to). We, for example, can not know where the extra Granger came from, since the protagonists never learn the details of this timeline.
The only people who claim they can provide a set of complete timelines is speculating and using information that is not in the film.
reply
share