My guess of where the actual truth lies
Let me start by saying that this doc was put together better than the movie Boondock Saints regardless of the obvous bias in the movie against Duffy by two "friends" who had a vendetta against him. The doc is breezily edited with no dull moments.
I also checked out the following links which give us both sides of the story:
http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?q=node/18847
http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/10/28/the-filmcast-interview-troy-duffy-director-of-the-boondock-saints-2-all-saints-day/
I agree Troy Duffy was a major *beep* But he was spot on that no matter how decent they were as a musical band, the only reason they got a contract was because of his film related breakthrough. Talented musical bands like that are dime a dozen. Without Troy, they have very tiny chance of meeting the right people for success. And even with that break, the band didn't sell more than a few hundred records. ANd of that, I wonder how many were bought by friends.
Does that mean Troy had a right to throw that in their face every single time? No. He was being a classless jerk, no doubt. He could have been a benevolent dictator to his buddies in the band.
One thing I would have liked to have seen was more exploration of the William Morris Agency. That was a pretty awful deal they made for Troy on TBS. Granted, considering how little demand the movie was in, Troy was never going to get a fair deal. You have to give up something major to entice a studio in picking it up. But for him not to have ANY percentage of the profits on video revenue is ridiculous since it was obvious that is whre any potential revenue lay.
I think it was a dickish move of the documentary guys to show that producer guy Chris B. hitting on another woman after dedicating his love for his sugar mama girlfriend. A lot of that stuff is common in HOllywood. you can break up a lot of relationships in Hollywood that way as a lot of them have indulged in some kind of inappropriate sexual behavior. If that couple is already broken up, then I guess it is a valid inclusion as no harm is done. But as a viewer, I guess I am happy they included such funny hypocritical behavior.