Maybe Duffy wasn't THAT bad?
First I'd like to say that I am not a Duffy fan. I liked Boondock Saints to a certain extent, it's a decent flick, and it's impressive considering it's the directorial debut of a bartender with no background and who also wrote the script, but I do not consider it a masterpiece.
I just watched Overnight and obviously I was disgusted with how Duffy acted, but is he really the absolute devil? He has some issues, and yes, fame got to his head way too quickly, but can we really judge a person by a subjective documentary made by people who hated him?
If someone films me punching you, and then you beat me up, but then they only edit the footage and show the part where you start hitting me, people will think I'm the victim. All I saw in this documentary where bits of Duffy acting like an *beep* but do we know what got him into that position? One of the most extreme ones was when he was yelling at the phone.
But what if that guy really was an ass to him? He was just being effed over by Weinstein & co. so I'm sure he was an emotional mess, and just couldn't take it anymore.
I read here some pretty interesting opinions, like "he hurt the people who stuck by him and believed in him" -- really? Did they actually help him cause they believed in his talent and wanted to see him succeed, or did they help him because he had a few hundred thousand dollars and a ticket to stardom, and they wanted a taste?
I'm not defending the guy, he obviously was at fault because you can't fake a documentary about a decent person and turn him into a monster. He has to be short-tempered, narcissistic, etc... to put himself in those positions, but I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt that maybe he was working with a bunch of shallow opportunists who wanted to cash in on his deal.
I read the interview with the two creators of the documentary from AintItCool and they came off just as bad as he was. Like saying he could have been in the closet and making fun of the sequel, are these really the people you trust to give you an objective view?
Don't get me wrong, I couldn't care less, but I am a filmmaker myself and when I did my short film everyone on the "set" kept butting in and giving me opinions. You should do this, and that, this doesn't work, etc... Unfortunately most of the cast and crew were friends with no real experience, and all of them wanted to make changes to my movie, it was VERY ANNOYING. Now I'm a calm and civilized guy and I just answered them respectfully. But what if I wasn't? What if instead of a short movie I'd be doing a 15 million dollar picture? They'd want a taste of that money and they'd be worse, and I'd be pretty nervous about not screwing up the movie, so I'd be worse as well, so it could lead to some really bad arguing...
And if someone is filming and showing only the bits where I get mad, it might make me look like the *beep* So don't be so quick to judge. We don't know these guys and we weren't there.