Henry Darger and autism


It seems to me that all the most common indicators of autism were present in the case of Henry Darger. Most notably, there was his penchant for keeping track of numbers, whether it be in his stories (war statistics) or in real life (keeping track of the weather ritualistically). Autism is typically characterized by repetitive or restricted behavior, which Henry Darger most certainly exhibited. As the film shows, his habits were repetitive and ritualistic. The film also demonstrates how highly restricted Henry's interests were.

Even his friendships were indicative of autism. From Wikipedia: "Contrary to common belief, autistic children do not prefer to be alone. Making and maintaining friendships often proves to be difficult for those with autism. For them, the quality of friendships, not the number of friends, predicts how lonely they feel." The film shows how important his Henry's few friendships were, as well as how lonely he felt when those friends were lost.

Henry's behavior was also indicative of autism. His resistance to change, his compulsive behavior, his talking to himself, and even his eating and sleeping habits demonstrated it.

To be honest, as I watched Henry's story unfold, I couldn't help but be reminded of controversial Internet personality Chris Chan, who has been diagnosed as with high-functioning autism. Chris has a series of drawings and stories remarkably similar to that of Henry's. Their manner of speech is nearly identical, as is their writing style. Both use long-winded narratives and describe even the minute aspects of their stories in great detail.

In the documentary, the possibility of Henry Darger's mental illness is touched on briefly. It's suggested that Henry may be schizophrenic, but this notion is quickly dismissed in the film. It disappoints me that the autism angle, which would explain much of Henry's behavior, is never explored.

reply

I don't fault the film for not pursuing the psychological angle. This is an æsthetical study not a psychological study. But I admit that during the film, the word "autistic" kept coming to mind.

I don't think Henry was intrinsically mentally ill. I think he was mentally damaged by his bleak family life and then by the incompetent handling, by his custodians, of his eccentric behavior, which at the time was inevitably pigeonholed as "feeble-minded".

Today, Darger doubtless would be diagnosed as autistic, perhaps even with Asperger's, and with treatment he surely would have had a happier, more fulfilling life. But the world would also be deprived of his monumental work which, after all, was borne of his obsessive need to create a world he had been deprived of in real life. For Darger and Van Gogh and Poe and others like them, it seems that only great alienation and anguish can bring forth great art. This doesn't mean that people should be made to suffer for art's sake -- I felt anger at Henry's unremitting privations -- but ocassionally, at least, we can be consoled that something beautiful comes of it.

reply



Agreed on the HFA spectrum. He lived it.

reply

I thought of this too, while watching the documentary.

reply

Me too. I rather quickly found myself thinking of him as "The Artistic Autistic."

reply

"The Artistic Autistic" would have been a better title than this, or maybe the shorter form: "Artism." Not that cheap puns should be used to pitch a documentary on a serious subject.

reply

This is August 2012, I just watched the movie for the first time. Yes, by today's standards, no doubt, Henry Darger was Autistic. Dude was Aspie to say the least, probably full out Autistic. At the time he lived, it wasn't known, so he was just considered to be a weird guy. By today's standards, though, Damn, dude, that guy has Autism, without a doubt. Totally trippy fantasy world that guy had going on in his little head back in the 1920's.

"Enough of that technical talk, Foo!"

reply