"LOL! I'm the idiot for not thinking Adam Sandler is a genius in the mold of Laurence Olivier and Marlon Brando. And I'm the child because I don't think Click is the best movie since Citizen Kane. Give me a break."
What in the hell are you talking about? You're an idiot, sure, but not for any of those reasons.
"Your arguments are as illogical as they are meaningless."
Which arguments? And illogical how?
"In your last post, you commented that I was dumb for calling a neurosurgeon independently wealthy."
No. I didn't. What abysmal reading comprehension you have.
"This is wrong on at least two levels. First of all, a neurosurgeon could be independently wealthy if he/she had his/her own business, as opposed to working in a public hospital or clinic and"
Their own business? You mean like a neurosurgeon business? Lmao. Learn your terminology kid or you'll tell your age then get upset when others notice it. If a physician is making money from a private practice, they are still not "independently-wealthy." You really are an idiot.
"(2) he/she could've came into money in no way associated with his/her work (e.g. like an inheritance)."
*come into money, dear. This is possible. Terribly irrelevant but possible. Never said it wasn't. Not sure why you posted this. Oh wait, no, I remember, it's because you're a moron who can't read.
"Then I mocked you for falling on the ancient imdb practice of accusing the other person of being a child. This is the oldest and maybe the dumbest practice in the imdb book."
Is it? Every cohort behaves a certain way. Steretypes come from a very real place. Adolescents/youths/children behave/respond in noticeably distinct ways that older cohorts generally do not. You're an inherently dumb and unwise ilk who stand out in very obvious ways to those with even minimal percipients. You are acting the way a child would which means you're either an immature adult, or a typically dumb kid. I happen to think it's the latter.
"Sounds like you're experiencing a little reaction formation (look it up)."
I can just imagine you picking up this term somewhere (someone used it against you perhaps?) and, vaguely understanding it, deciding to adopt it as part of your vernacular to feign intelligence despite, again, not fully understanding the theory. This is made clear by your embarrassing misuse of the phrase. This is a typical child's error, btw. Yes, adults do it too but children do it most. In ten years, if you get the chance, read some papers by adolescents, or maybe your own old papers, and you'll see what I mean. I hope you're not dense enough to still be wondering why one would take you for an adolescent/child.
"You're trying to pretend that you're this enlightened and intelligent individual, but you're defending a critically-panned Adam Sandler movie. Doesn't exactly put you in the best light now does it?"
When did I ever defend this movie? You are an unintelligent, unenlightened, and unperceptive little fool through and through.
Is it wrong to assure a young girl that she's ugly? I mean what's wrong with not being pretty?
reply
share