With all due respect, even a low budget film should have a solid story!
While I respect the budget and what was done with it, I just can't look at this as being a "good film". Was it a great accomplishment with what he had to work with? YES! Could I have pulled this off? HELL NO! Has anyone else really been able to produce something like this for less than $2000? I don't think so!
After seeing the film I really question some of the reviews. Are the reviews praising this film because of it's content, or because of what it managed to accomplish? If for example none of the "facts" about the production of this film were known, would anyone like this movie at all?
I'm sorry, I gave it more than a fair chance. Hell, both my friend and I blindly purchased copies of the DVD at the same! The story was actually the weak point for me, even though the acting wasn't stellar either. Usually I can live with poor acting, but coupled with this story I just didn't find it a positive experience. Has anyone else see this and not like it?
***ONE QUESTION PLEASE***
I do not ask this sarcastically, I ask this seriously.
What was the point of DNA-21 (I think that was the name) in regards to the overall plot? I don't see how it impacted anyone in the movie at all?? The only thing I could come up with at one point was she was cloned, until I decided that she was in fact in Paris in a hospital, unless my initial thought was right?