After watching


The most fascinating thing about this documentary was what I found out after watching it.
Naturally I was curious to find out "more" and that "more" included all the evidence that was left out. It's ridiculous! How can this be seen as an unbiased documentary considering all the facts that were not brought up.
Mike's footprint on the BACK of his wife's pants (she was found face up).
Todd being there BEFORE the police were. He did not live there.
Todd not being a fan of his step mom at all.
The amount of debt they were in with Mike bringing in no money and being the beneficiary of a life insurance policy.
The blood spatter on the inner thigh of his pants which youd get from standing over a body.
There's lots more.
Anyway - its ridiculous. He did it. He's a sociopath and for all we know, he's convinced his kids to believe him or fear him.
Two dead women, two staircases. Come on.

reply

Blood splatter on shorts and footprint were brought up, several times. The blood spatter episode of the sbi agent bashing the sponge. Huge part of documentary.

reply

most of the that was not focused on until after the 10th episode,
the last 3 episodes didn't air until last month, June 2018,
this guy's post is from a year ago

reply

Prove it

reply

read about it on wikipedia you lazy gay bitch

reply

Make me and I’m not gay.

reply

i'm not gay

reply

You dont like packing fudge?

reply

I agree with this. Very biased. Didn't mention the blood spatter high up the walls either and this was clearly discussed on film but omitted as you can see it listed on the first page of the good thing/bad thing exercise that his defence counsel used.

reply

Yes the documentary was biased, it's clear he did it. The blood, plus 7 gashes from her head, plus injuries to her thyroid (strangulation). It's a pity Deaver purjered himself. Peterson's life was lies, from his military 'injury' to his cheating with gay men.

She found out he was gay, they fought, he escalated to violence and murdered her.

reply