Coming from a broken home (where the parents weren’t at all nice/kind), I empathized with Max’s feelings. I disapproved of his actions.
In saying that, I agree w/mastyrmynd’s thinkning about how this child clearly had no concept of (in)appropriate behavior (at least not at the beginning of the movie) or how good he really had it.
HOWEVER, unlike what seems to be the majority opinion here, I don’t think it’s Max’s fault. If growing up, you got constant attention from anyone/everyone you wanted it from, whenever and wherever you wanted it, then you’ll automatically think you’re entitled to it b/c that’s just the way the world works. Similarly, if you grow up never ever suffering negative consequences for your actions (s/a destroying other’s property, yelling/screaming inappropriately, biting or throwing things at people), then in your mind there’ll be nothing to deter you from committing those actions. In this case, it’s the mother who is acting inappropriately.
Consider the snowball incident—Max sees people who can potentially give him attention, so he tries to get attention from them by throwing (non-harmful) things at them. Luckily, the other kids respond favorably & start playing with him, returning fire. Now, during the course of the snowball fight, Max NEVER gives any indication that he wants the older kids to stop pursuing him once he runs into the igloo. He’s even laughing up to the point where the one boy jumps on the igloo, ruining his hard work.
Now, Max could’ve learned something here- he could’ve learned that you shouldn’t start a snowball fight unless you’re willing to finish it (& risk losing some of your things in the process). He could’ve learned (as mastyrmynd said) that you shouldn’t throw things at people and “not expect to get your face stomped out and your hut smashed.” But alas, bad parenting to the rescue. Later when he tells his mother about the igloo, his mom’s all “I would’ve done something about that,” as if those nasty older kids were maliciously trying to hurt Max & destroy his igloo on purpose. She actually defends his actions instead of telling him the reality of the situation that that kind of thing can in fact happen if you start a snowball fight w/someone (a perfectly reasonable outcome if you ask me). Max wasn’t hurt, the boy who belly-flopped on the igloo seemed concerned that he might’ve hurt him, so it wasn’t like he was intending to clobber him. All that happened was the play went further than Max would’ve liked, & his mom just reinforces the idea that he can do whatever he wants & expect a lack of consequences for it.
reply
share