Whose idea was this?


OK, I understand this film has its fans, but I found it nigh unwatchable. It truly was a struggle to finish this thing. I mean, really, take a pack of fearsome wild monsters and make them a bunch of whiny, and hopelessly irritating 20-somethings with a world-class case of insecurity? Five minutes in and I wanted to slap the lot of them silly. And yes, I know Sendak had a hand in the writing.

I'm guessing this movie could only appeal to the same demographic of college dropouts, stoned and complaining about how unfair and cruel the world has been to them. Pop this dvd in, knock back a few bong hits and muse on how the wild things are soooo like the sad, mean and lonely people they know, which they probably are.

Me, I just feel ripped off for having sat down and watched 110 minutes and $75 million worth of non-stop bellyaching (so I hope you can forgive me my 2 minutes). I was curious to see what the response was on the imdb boards, however, and while some seem to feel as I do, there were quite a few positive comments even if most seem to come from the aforementioned demographic.

I did give those comments some thought, but I still can't see this film much differently than I did on first reflection. It is filled with trite and cliched "lessons", there doesn't seem to be any real character development. The wild things leave the story pretty much as they were when Max found them, Max doesn't seem to be any different for his adventure. Neither the wild things nor Max seem to be endowed with any particular wisdom and none of them seem to gain any as the story progresses either. The score was relentlessly depressing and the script feels stretched rather thin, not a surprise given the source material is a 48-page picture book with a word count under 500. The visuals are pretty good, but that's about the only nice thing I can say about this movie.

So, anyway, I guess I just needed to vent. I'm not here looking for validation or to engage in an argument with someone who really liked it. If you want to tell me I just don't "get" the movie, fine, you'd be correct, I don't. On the other hand, if you haven't seen this movie, but are thinking about it, my advice would be not to bother.

OK, I feel a little better now.



reply

The movie is an "adult" adaptation of a children's book. The "wild things" are part of Max's imagination and his unbridled rage toward his family.

They don't change. Max changes.

???

reply

actually what I meant to say was that it was "geared" toward adults, not that it was "adult" that sounds kinda funny

???

reply

Was it for adults??

I ve been hearing a lot abut this movie, with goo reviews. Watch it last night...and want it to end fast as soon as he started having "adventures".

I found it boring...I was expecting something better.

reply

I don't think we were supposed to be thinking of the monsters as twenty-somethings. I think they were supposed to be of the same emotional age as Max, making them more akin to children.

That in itself makes their behaviour feel more excusable; they're not supposed to be 'young adults', they're acting like children.

reply

agreed, theres a part when one accuses max of being a "boy in wolf clothes, not a real king" and one of the wild things says "so he's just like us?"

so its def suppose to be max who learned but it is still a depressing story. when he hears kw say "life is hard enough" he decides to go back to his mother right after, he see's that maybe she's just scared also and he was wrong for taking out his fear of death/the end on her.

reply

I'm halway thru it and really (really!) tempted to bail. This feels like one of those after school things with giant muppets.

I've never read the book, but I've read it's, at least in part, an examination on how Max uses his imagination to learn about his anger. He has to come to term with his that emotion before he can learn to control it.

The problem with turning a short book about a 9-year-old using his imagination into a full length movie is there isn't much room here for the audience's imagination. So far I'm giving it a 2/5 netflix score. The visuals are impressive. The story is, as you say, pretty thin and uninspiring.

reply

I didn't find it unwatchable; I felt that visually, it was fairly entertaining.

What I did find annoying was how whiny, negative & emotionally fragile all the characters were. Yes, I fully understand that the monsters are basically aspects of Max's personality, and I get the symbolism. I get that Max learns from his monsters how he had been acting in real life, and how freaking annoying it is trying to get along with someone like that. But Max was SO annoying, right from the start, that I just could not empathize or connect with his character at all.

Despite the fact that he's obviously from a broken home, doesn't like his mom's new date, hates his sister for not sticking up for him when her friends stomped on his igloo, doesn't have his own friends and doesn't seem to get enough attention from his mommy even though she's strapped for cash and barely holding the family together, he still comes off as a rotten little BRAT. I never got that feeling from the Max of the book. I mean, he bit his mom, what a rotten kid! If I'd ever bit my mom at that age, I would've been knocked into next week. He seems like he's got the worst case of bi-polar depression I've ever seen, flipping almost instantaneously from happy, ecstatic playing kid to needy, crying, brooding brat over nothing. Max in the book was misbehaving; Max in the movie needed to be committed for psychological evaluation, and could likely benefit from some medication as well.

Then all the games he comes up with to play in his fantasy-world entail a lot of injury & violence, and there's talk of being eaten & threats of harm. When I was a kid, me & my friends had plenty of "dirtball fights," and we used to huck giant clods of dirt out of the freshly tilled fields at each other, usually aiming for each others' heads. We also had "sword fights" with sticks, shot each other with rubber bullets and wrestled, all in good fun. So I was kind of surprised it bothered me that Max was so violent-minded. I guess it was because I wasn't identifying with the Max character at all.

I also couldn't figure out if the movie was meant for kids or adults. The book is great & teaches a subtle lesson. The movie on the other hand, was very dark, profoundly emotional, and disintegrated into the characters all standing off against each other, glumly turning their backs on one another or going off by themselves to mope & sulk alone. They have awful love/hate relationships, berate each other, and exhibit extremely dependent, selfish behavior that is the core of every severely dysfunctional family. The movie was depressing, and depressed me.

»«ëÕ|{¥(V)
I can't understand your crazy moon language.

reply

Xeokym, I was annoyed by your post. You are as whiny, negative and emotionally fragile as the characters in the movie.

YOU say YOU FULLY UNDERSTAND how the monsters symbolize MAX and that MAX learns how MAX had been behaving in real life. MAX is growing up in a deeply flawed, negative and sometimes violent world and reacts in a deeply flawed, negative and sometimes violent way to it, yet it is MAX that needs psychiatric evaluation. Right.

It's okay that YOU had violent playtime when YOU were a kid, but it's not okay when MAX has violent playtime. YOU are surprised how much it bothers YOU and YOU can't identify with MAX at all. YOU can't figure out if the movie was meant for kids or adults and it was really depressing.

You're really going to hate this part: YOU ARE MAX. Wake up, you hypocrite. Turn the letters in your name around, Xeokym, and it practically spells "Max."

You hate about others what you hate about yourself.

reply

Hey man, its ok to entail disagreement, but don't be an *beep* about it.

reply

I think his point was the the book-Max was more relatable than the movie-Max? The rest is really beyond the point.

reply

I agree with you completely, Xeokym! I felt the same ways.

reply

It was quite depressing...

---
"Is that an iceberg?"

reply

It seems like a lot of people aren't understanding that the reason the characters act the way they do is because they are reflections of Max. The wild things, while seemingly adults, act like children because Max is a child. This is how he imagines their interactions to be.

The film does not take on a completely traditional story arc but I don't think it should be hated for it.

If you view the film as a scenario where the wild things are actually real, then yes, they act like immature children. If you view it as though it's all in Max's head, then acting like immature children makes perfect sense. The attention to detail here is a GOOD thing, IMO.

reply

one of my earliest memories is reading the book, i love spike jonez, i love fantasy films and all kinds of films in general and couldnt wait for this.
i remember it left me cold and didnt seem to be about anything much, just kind of depressing for no obvious reason. maybe i should watch it again.

reply

I don't know, but it was a bad idea, in my opinion. I got it for 5.00 at Target, thinking my son and I could watch a movie together this afternoon, since we both loved the book. Dull, depressing, dark, blah. Neither of us sustained interest after 30 minutes, that in itself was more than enough.

reply

His room didnt turn into a forest

Token black Chris Tucker

reply

[deleted]