I thought Jodi was a pig?


There are many differences with the first movie, the book and this updated version that was not half bad. The effects here very very good and had some very creepy moments. I know that this was proven a hoax but it still is kind of scary.

This was the Ryan Reynolds-look and me I have a great body movie-he looks good and it shows.

Still I miss the flys, the get out, the chinese dragon and the missing money part of the first movie and book-the studio made alot of concessions.

But as a horror film-not a based on real life film-it was entertaining. Although the first one was cheesy-it still gave me more scares than this version.

6 out of 10.

reply

Being that I grew up on Long Island and lived not too far from the house, this 'tale' means a bunch to me as a horror fanatic...

I was a big fan of the first three movies, however the bunch that trailed afterward were terrible. I had some hope for the remake in 2005 and went to see it opening night.

I did sit and watch through the entire movie, however this was the first movie in which I was angry while watching since it just didn't make any sense... Jodie was a demonic pig, not a DeFeo...

And isn't the mystery on how Ronnie went through the house that night and killed everyone without a soul waking up or even making a sound? (That's the true horror right there!) This starts off with 'Jodie' waking up and hiding in the closet. Bleh!

reply

[deleted]

Watching it right now and that has to be the lamest thing so far! Making the pig a little girl? I have the fast forward button ready...

(I lived in Plainview LI for 30 years and remember the actual incident well)

reply

They made the change because they felt that a pig faced creature named Jodie was kind of unrealistic in terms of a little girl actually befriending it. Seriously, did you remember what "jodie" looked like in the 1979 film? How the hell would any little girl wanna play with that thing?

I for one stand by their decision to change it, because i felt Jodie as a little girl was far more terrifying than just a couple of red eyes in the window sill. The shot of George seeing the girl jodie in the window was scary as hell, and made sense within the context of the story!!





"1...2....guess who's coming for you..."

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

"So why wouldn't a little girl want to play with her very own Miss Piggy? "

Did you see what "jodie" looked like in the original film? When George looks up at the window? Sorry, but that doesnt look like anything remotely friendly, and Miss Piggy doesnt compare in any possible way.

"but knowing "Jodie the pig" was now Jodie (really Allison) DeFeo"

She wasnt Allison DeFeo. They simply changed a pig into a girl, thats all. Thats why they were very creative with Jodie, and the things she did.(like the finger through her head with the babysitter) They werent disrespecting in any way, they simply made a change to better suit the story they were trying to tell.

"1...2....guess who's coming for you..."

reply

[deleted]

"in the 2005 version is represented by the Youngest DeFeo child character. That would be Allison and an insult. "

Care to provide something that PROVES this was the intention of the film makers? If you cant, sorry bill, then you are basically twisting the film to make it worse than it really is. Ill be waiting patiently....

"1...2....guess who's coming for you..."

reply

[deleted]

So you admit, you have no PROOF that this was the intentions of the film makers. Thank you wild bill. :)

"1...2....guess who's coming for you..."

reply

[deleted]

When James Brolin looked at the window and saw a pig staring back at him is one of the creepiest scenes ever. I felt it lost something when they made it a little girl.

reply

And a "good" little girl at that. "Jody" saved "Chelsea" from her maniacal, axe-weilding father, George Lutz (as portrayed in this film) -- a rip-off of "Tony" the demon that possessed "Danny" and protected him from his maniacal father Jack Torrance in "The Shining."

It was a disgusting put-off that they made Mr. Lutz into the demon and Jody into the "guardian angel under demonic bondage." (Jody was caught, crying, and taken back through the floor and hellfire for punishment for letting the Lutzes flee at the end of the movie)


Part of the psychological horror of the "actual" story (not the 2005 movie) was the way George Lutz was desperate but powerless to help or save his family from the house or whatever haunted/possessed it.


And yes, the way the little girl (Chelsea in this movie, Missy in the novel, Amy in the 1979 movie) saw Jody the Pig could have been very different for her. The father and others could have seen something far more horrifying.

In fact, there is really no reason a pig need be shown at all. Children rarely actually "see" their imaginary playmates, even if they seem to believe in them.

BTW, one of the scariest masks I have is a pig mask -- its very realistic, and on a human it just looks uncanny and freaky. If we were to "see" Jody the Pig, it could just have something "wrong" and uncanny that a child simply might not see or notice. Those scary red eyes might have just been vampiristically hypnotic and the girl is brainwashed into believing a friendly encounter with Mr. Pig.

reply

"They made the change because they felt that a pig faced creature named Jodie was kind of unrealistic in terms of a little girl actually befriending it. Seriously, did you remember what "jodie" looked like in the 1979 film? How the hell would any little girl wanna play with that thing?"

THANK YOU!! My god I thought I was the only one with a problem with this! Granted the response right above mine is a good response. I just wanted to put my two cents in.

Why are people so hung up on Jodi being a pig? Why does she HAVE to be a pig or the movie's ruined?

I've never read the book, so maybe they explain her more in the book...I don't know.

-Amanda

"She will remember your heart when men are fairy tales in storybooks written by rabbits"

reply

Because in the novel Jody WAS a pig, invisible, red eyes occasionally seen, and the novel was scary as Hell.



And 'cause' never was the reason for the evening,
--Or the Tropic of Sir Galahad.

reply

Plus he may have made himself look cute to the girl, like Porky Pig or Babe.

reply

Yeah the scene at the end where Jodie was dragged under was weird. If it was really the spirit of a sad and angry little girl who is now full of hate and torment versus a actual demon then it was kind of sad how she was just sucked back under into presumed purgatory. Whats weird though is that at first she screams and all the furniture and stuff moves then we see a little tear fall down her face. This fits with her being in torment by why does she give the little smile right before she is pulled under. That almost suggests she was actually a demon posing as Jodie and not the spirit of Jodie herself. I think a lot of people may think it was a demon and not the actual spirit of a child. I preferred to believe it was the Jodie spirit in pain. Also as far as the thing whether they should have made Jodie the demon pig or a little girl there could have been a solution to that. Chelsea could have seen the demon in the form of a little girl that befriends her but in reality she had the form of a pig. So in scenes when say the step father saw her she would look like a pig. I say they should have gone with that angle and it is creepy.

The scary clown doll is hiding under my bed.

reply



I'm SERIOUSLY craving barbecue.

reply

Yes! Agree with Error!

I read the book when I was a little girl (not the smartest thing I've done - kept me up at night for months!), before I saw the movies, and the one line I remember to this day, as it scared the living daylights out of me, was when George was walking in the the garden one night, he looked up into Missy's window and "staring down at him, was the face of a pig!"

Loved (hated) that damn pig and I missed its inclusion in this version of the film.

The worst thing about this film was changing Jodi/Jodie/Jody from a pig into one of the DeFeo children. Lord what an uninspired idea that was! I can kind of understand them wanting to move away from the pig but to make it one of the original murder victims was formulaic and lacked imagination.


So put some spice in my sauce, honey in my tea, an ace up my sleeve and a slinkyplanb

reply

I have an idea for a restaurant JODI THE HELLPIG'S BARBECUE

reply

I think that the girl plotline was pretty decent. gave more depth to the story than just a silly little pig with red eyes.

And let's face it ladies, DeFeo wasn't possessed by any kind of demon other than heroin. He killed his family in cold blood. and yes, they heard him; you against a geeking heroin junkie with a gun...hm...."Rollover, okay...."

Let's all face facts that The Amityville Horror was actually Ronnie DeFeo kiling his family in cold blood and not some idiotic opportunistic story about ghosts and such.

Swing away, Merrill....Merrill, swing away...

reply

In reality "Jodie" was an obese Siamese Cat that belonged to the Defeo's neighbors. Butch hated the Cat and called it a Pig. the cat would jump up and look at them through the windows at night. I guess that wasn't scary enough though. The Shyster lawyer changed it into a Pig in the book.

The real horror is how the Defeo's murders were exploited for money.

reply

[deleted]

Jodie was definitely a pig in the book. I always took it that "she" could change forms or appearances and thus Chelsea/Missy/Amy would see something non-threatening so she wouldn't get scared and run for the hills.

It would have worked better as Jodie being shown as the little girl and then reveal her later to the adults as the pig.

Although come to think of it...why would a demonic pig creature ever want to befriend a little girl? It had nothing better to do? Trying to score brownie points so it could get into heaven by doing a little "community service work"?

It really makes no sense.

reply