Misleading?


I rented this movie because of Ralph Fiennes. I wise excited about this movie because I was expecting a great love story. This story is barely a love story. Don't get me wrong, I thought it was a pretty good movie, but it was marketed as a love story and it really was more of a historical drama. Their is no real interaction physically between Fiennes and Natasha and when they do share their one kiss in the movie, it is short and leaves the viewer questioning whether or not she was really into him or not. I did like this film, but it was advertised wrongly. Does anyone else feel the same way?

reply

I disagree, one doesn't needs to interact physically to express one's love. The love between Jackson and the Countess is more subtle. This movie doesn't have to spell it out for you that those two people are in love.

reply

It was definitly more subtle, but one of the posters is of their kiss, making it seem that it would be full of passion. They did have share a love. It was almost like Finding Neverland, only a little deeper, but I still feel that it was not marketed as it should be. Nonetheless, it was a good movie with yet another brilliant perfromance by Fiennes.

reply

Film marketing is often, sadly, far from film making.

reply

I agree with you, there is little physical interaction between the two, in fact Mr. Jackson makes it a point to avoid that.
I liked the movie but it was a very, very, subtle love story, at best.

reply

If you just look at the cover on the DVD, yes, it was misleading. I do see it as a love story--just not real passionate, but more of a realistically developed romance. Actually, I was kind of happy to see Ralph in a film without a lot of heavy breathing. It was more of an old fashioned type of movie.

reply

Oh yes , you are so right when you say it's a pleasure to see Ralph F. in a movie where there is an absence of heavy breathing. You have to remember this story is set in a time when people kept their feelings under wraps. The Russians were former aristocrats, who are always aloof. Sophia was actually quite passionate compared to the rest of the family, who were living the past.
Add to that they were is an unreal situation in a foreign country and in unsettled times. In situations like that no-one behaves as they would in their own environment. In a time of war people do the strangest things and they pair up with people they wouldn't in peace time. I felt there was a strong undercurrent of passion. Jackson and Sophia harboured a lot of unspoken feeling for one another this adds to the tension. You have to had experienced this yourself to recognise it when you see it. This kind of tension acts as a powerful accellerant when social tension collapses, which it does and when it does the two leads immediately gravitate towards oneanother.

reply

Even the title of the movie is somewhat misleading. "The White Countess" can be taken (and probably is by a lot of people) as a reference to her skin color-which borderlines on racism. I doubt if the film company intended that allusion though. Instead, the term "White Countess" refers to the fact that she was a "White Russian"; a term that has nothing to do with race but rather with politics- the other russians being termed "Reds" or Bolshieviks (Communists is the western term). The "White Russians" were noncommunists who were loyal to the Czar. After the death of the Czar they were loyal to the idea of a monarchist Russia.

reply