interesting Jewish touch


I don't know a thing about this movie or where it came from other than I just saw it yesterday. Saying that, I was struck at the singling out (in a nice way) of the Jewish Mr. Feinstein. I noticed that ugly things were said about him in his presence and others remarked upon the cruelty of it. I believe this situation came up a second time. What I thought was amazing and insightful was the little speech that he (Mr. Feinstein) gave about it, in addition to what I took to be the thoughtfully indulgent use of the camera. I can't express myself as well as I would like, but I thought it was beautiful the way Mr. Feinstein stood there, standing tall (and he wasn't tall) and proud with his arms folded confidently. He was given a full frontal camera shot--how generous is that? It was either at this moment or another one like it when he essentially acknowledged that he was aware of the ugliness around him and his childeren were also aware of it but, he said (or something close) "but I don't hear it and I don't let it bother me and my children don't hear it and it doesn't bother them."
How sad he even had to have such an attitude, but he kept on pushing forward and didn't let it bring him down.

I loved the moment--so telling, so dramatic, so generous to let him have his moment. It wasn't even particularly necessary to advance the plot. Bravo!

reply

I, too, found this touching. In the recent past, a documentary came out about the plight of Jewish families from Germany who were stranded in Shanghai during the Japanese occupation. Things were precarious for these brave souls for a good long period of time. I am glad this status was honored in this remarkable movie The White Countess.

reply

For those interested, the book by Marica Reynders Ristaino, entiled "Port of Last Resort" - The Diaspora Communities of Shanghai - expertly chronicles both the post-Bolshevik Russian refugee situation, the Jewish refugees, who fled and survived the Nazi Holocaust. Shanghai was an amazingly free city in the 1930s, and these groups of refugees were certainly all the better for it.

"The White Countess" evokes with palpable deftness and a well-defined creative urgency the magnificent ambiance of the Shanghai of the 1930s. The use of the erhu (two-stringed bowed instrument) in Richard Robbins' haunting score renders the film all the more poignant, because even though the setting is Shanghai, the Chinese for the most part, remain in the background. However in the score, the erhu is quite prominent, something the Chinese never were in the Shanghai of the 1930s.

reply

I have to disagree. The Jewish character indeed did not advance the plot and actually it even cheapened it. Although that was a charming character, I think that his preching in exactly the scene you refer to seemed out of place, as did the whole scene. It seems to me that the film had it in there just because such admirable Jewish characters sell well in Holywood. And that character was so perfect - in the times of the biggest panic he left his own kids alone to look for Sofia's child... It was just too much - this whole emphasis on his Jewishness and his prefectness. They kept repeating that he was a Jew - why not just a human, just a good neighbor, a fellow person in exile.
I do like Jews a lot but that scene and that Jewish element seemed to me as a part of the movie meant to suck up to the Academy.
Otherwise, on the movie, I agree with other postings that acting was very good but the movie wasn't. It stretched too long, was very unrealistic (Ralph Feinnes' character was doing too well for a blind man, especially when he reached the docks in that havoc), the ending was, of course, typically Holywood, and despite the good acting the few scenes where the main characters interacted did not manage to portray well the growing passion between them as was the intention. Also characters were way too one-dimensional - the Russian family - so mean and unfair, she - such an angel, the Jewish guy also tremendously noble...

reply

I agree, while not badly acted, his role was as a token Jew, too good to be true and with no time to develop.

reply

this whole emphasis on his Jewishness and his prefectness. They kept repeating that he was a Jew - why not just a human, just a good neighbor, a fellow person in exile.
Because Jews weren't treated as "just a human", "just a good neighbor", back then. Especially by the Russian aristocracy. Russia under the tsars was one of the most anti-Semitic countries that ever existed. They would never have looked at Jews with the neutrality you expect. This was also the 1930s, when anti-Semitism in the world, and especially in Europe, was approaching the worst heights it ever reached in history. Being a Jew was a specific and unique experience in that time, and no Jew lived as "just a human", "just a neighbor".

You might as well ask, in the case of Sofia, why not "just a human" instead of a White Russian aristocrat. Because of the context. She was there because she was an exiled aristocrat, just as Feinstein was there because he was a Jew. Though I don't mean to imply that "persecution" of aristocrats and persecution of Jews are anything alike, or that they were exiles for anywhere near the same reasons; I only mean to say that they were there specifically because of who and what they were. As much for the Jews as for the White Russians.

reply