MovieChat Forums > Little Fish (2005) Discussion > Read Storylines Before Watching A Movie ...

Read Storylines Before Watching A Movie Like This


Or, maybe some folks should just read storylines (typically found on IMDB) before watching any movies.

For example, if a potential viewer read the storyline to this movie prior to watching it, or even while watching it, it would quickly alleviate confusion some are complaining about regarding most of the characters' relationships to each other and even would help to explain some of the plot. These folks then would have the kind of 'schematic' they seem to need (based on some comments I have been reading on this message board) to frame the movie so that maybe they can then enjoy it for its other qualities.

This isn't the kind of movie where there is going to be a predictable, linear "Start Point A -> Middle Point B --> End Point C" to it. It isn't meant to unpack that way, but is instead more of a character study where the viewer is plopped into the middle of the lives and relationships of the characters portrayed and then goes on from there. The camera (as the eye of the viewer) follows these characters through vignettes of their lives, more like 'real' life as opposed to 'cinema' life. Real life is not all about gritty, organized dialogue; car chases and explosions; and, all loose ends tied up neatly in two hours or so. The narratives of our lives are generally a lot 'messier' than the typical 'Hollywood' type of movie would portray.

Tracy begins as someone who is still awakening to her sobriety and to the lingering repercussions and pitfalls stemming from her addicted life -- and not only the roadblock situations she encounters, but also her emotional reactions to these situations.

People's lives, especially given the types of situations and lifestyles portrayed, are more likely to be meandering than to be straight shots. I think that was at least part of what this movie was trying to portray.

So, if the viewer can accept all this, then maybe same viewer can better appreciate this beautifully filmed movie, with its stunning performances, instead of comparing it to a type of movie that it was not meant to be in the first place.

This film may not be everyone's cup of tea, but I think that it is unfair to hold it to criteria that simply don't 'fit'.

I, myself, 'went along for the ride' of this movie. I was not 'bored' by it, my confusion morphed into clarity with each successive scene regarding the relationships/situations (somewhat mirroring the character of Tracy as she achieves increasing clarity as the story unfolds), and the only problem I had with it is that I think the director cheated a bit at the end by throwing in some hurried, formulaic plot devices.

And, again, if some viewers have problems understanding the stories and/or relationships of movies like these (as some have complained on this board), my advice would be to read up on a movie before seeing it.

Just my two cents!
denise1234 :)



"I can't stand a naked light bulb, any more than..a rude remark or a vulgar action" Blanche DuBois

reply

You think it is profound to pendantically state the obvious. Good for you.

A great movie will stand on its own, and doesn't need to be framed (spoiled) beforehand.

Most viewers understood the intentions of the writer/director, and still recognized this movie as garbage.

reply


Actually I think a good movie does require some work for the viewer to do and doesn't spoonfeed you. Having said that, I did not find this movie that confusing. WhoisthePrisoner1, how on Earth could you know what most viewers recognise in this movie? It is still scoring just below a 7, so most viewers are rating it highly. It also won a lot of awards. Have you asked everyone who watched it these questions? Sweeping statements are not helpful.

I think it was a beautiful movie, with amazing performances, cinemotography and soundtrack. One of the best films I've seen for ages.
.....
"No time for the old in-out,love-I'm just here to check the metre"

reply

It won a lot of awards? Wowweeeeeee! It must be EPICLY, THE BESTEST EVER EVA EVER!

reply

I was just using that as an example to counteract your statement of 'most viewers' recognising it as garbage. It didn't just win awards, it won some well-respected awards, nominated by respected members of the film industry and critics. It also has a fairly high rating on here. How do you figure that most people don't like it?

Sarcasm sucks.

.....
"No time for the old in-out,love-I'm just here to check the metre"

reply

OMG!!! Not just regular awards, but RESPECTED awards given by not just regular members, but REPECTED members! It must be the most epically EPICness of the EPIC!!! No politics, corruption, money, etc.. is EVER involved in the RESPECTED industry of awards from the RESPECTED!!! They know so much more than the non-respected!!!!!!!!!!!

FAIRLY HIGH RATING!!!!! OMG!!!! It must be an amazingly EPIC film, a really, really good film!!! ONLY the greatest and highest quality movies are rated highly on IMDB, because ONLY the highest standards are used by the IMDB members! Just look through the list.........yep.....if IMDB members rate it "fairly high", a SIX POINT THREE no doubt, it is really, really amazingly epic in its epicness!!! 6.3 movies are always the bestest everish!!! Grossing only 3.2 mil worldwide means that it was so EPIC that only a few paid to see its epicness and kept little fish their little secret.

reply

Do you normally shout hysterically and rely on sarcasm to make your point? I can't even be bothered reading all of your rude response. Was just wondering on what basis you decided that most people thought it was rubbish. I was actually interested in your answer as I enjoy discussions on these boards. offered you some of my ideas and the best you can do is act like a hysterical teenager. If you don't want to discuss films I don't know why you are on here.

.....
"No time for the old in-out,love-I'm just here to check the metre"

reply

Whoistheprisoner1 is HYSTERICAL, SARCASTIC, and RUUUUUUUDE!!!!!!

How could whoistheprisoner1 think that most people thought it was garbage, when most people didn't see it? whoistheprisoner1 is CRAAAAAAZY person!!!!! The TEN people that saw it, rated it a epic SIX POINT ONE!!! And non-corrupt, non-political totally unbiased RESPECTED people said it was GREAT!!!!

Why on earth is whoistheprisoner1 on here!!!!!!.......especially if he can't answer to my genius response?????

reply

"Just Go with It" also has a SIX POINT THREE! According to emmaemmaem, it is a MUST SEE!!! Because it is "just under SEVEN"! And on IMDB, "just under SEVEN" is a MUST SEE!!!

reply

Whoistheprisoner: You're making an ass out of yourself. Are you 12?? Because you sure don't get any points across acting like that! The poster you're commenting to was trying to have a RATIONAL discussion with you. Looks like that proves impossible. Yes!!!! IMMMPOSSIBLLLEE!!!! Toooo havvee a discussion wiithh yyyoouuuuu!! (can ya SEE what that sht "reads" like?)!

"Whores get *nothing*!"

reply

Truth must hurt, kid.

reply

Ok(???)

"Whores get *nothing*!"

reply

I would disagree. Had I read the storyline, it would have told me that the entire plot was about a drug deal where she needs to raise money. That was a small part of it and would have turned off the movie.

I think this movie is mostly about her trying to deal with her withdrawal symptoms while surrounded by junkies and drug dealers.

reply