The Thing Below/keep it below like in the sewer

"It takes recycled footage from other films,"

I was really stunned to see this because I have never seen this movie before but there was a scene in the movie that I know I've seen before. When the brother was recalling how it was happening, and they were showing a scene of a girl with black eyes who said, "It's under my skin!" and tried to up the radiation... That came from another movie I saw! I can't even find it right now but I remember it was from a movie where the cast went into an old underground bunker or something of the sort but a creature got loose where it'd take over people's bodies and they'd start turning to slime somehow.

My wife and I hardly ever listen to critics who give movies bad reviews. This is only because usually, the reviewer is so out of touch with reality they lack the mental capacity to properly digest a film for the message.

However, I really wish I would have looked here first before wasting 30 miuntes of my life on this awful scrap of celuloid.

That's right; we turned it off after less than half an hour.

And from what we actually suffered through, it came as no suprise that the director is a wannabe porn maker. (I know, I read that he has since disowned the film.) But, reusing the same scenes, even mirroring them to make them look different, my first thought was, "Is this guy twelve?"

That, added to the bad acting, it looked as though some poor schmoe took pity on the director and bought his sob story about wanting to make a serious film.

Too bad. The concept is workable, but this film just didn't cut it.

If you do want to see this film, may I recomend a HAS-MAT suit?

"Who's the more foolish? The fool, or the fool who follows him?"

[deleted]