Going to watch it AGAIN!
This wasn't so bad a movie. I've seen WORSE movies (Blood Sucking Freaks and Coppula's Dracula I couldn't even finish watching...).
I'm just curious about the plot. It actually seems like there WAS one, so I thought a second viewing might clarify things a little.
Personally, I don't care much about acting/dialogue and there really wasn't a whole lot of special effects to worry about. As someone else pointed out, If you are expecting Shakespeare or LOTR, your watching the wrong movie.
Of course, plot holes abound in movies like these:
If the little girl died in 1967, how come her sister didn't age for 37 years?
How could she have sex with Stan if he's a ghost? I'd think she would notice the less than healthy body if it WAS his body (gotta love the necrophilic overtones there).
Was the cop the ORIGINAL victim or the second one on the dam? It looked like the former and if that was the case, how come nobody noticed (see what I said about Stan above)?
All the crap about her parents was utterly pointless. No wonder so many here couldn't get to the ACTUAL movie because of it.