A good idea badly done
WARNING: POSSIBLE SPOLIER
I liked the idea of this movie: both investigate the working of the oyster industry and explore interpersonal relations but it was simply so bad, technically, that I ended up dislikeing it.
The directing was poor from the opening scene:the guy's been given a come on and he turns away looking as if he's wondering if he left the iron on at home. The slapstick scene with the dead dog was funny but clashed with the dramatic level of the story.
The continuity sucked: In several contiguous scenes Brownie changes, then re-changes jeans. It's supposed to be 40C and he's dressed for midwinter and sleeps under a blanket, I don't think so.
The use of 'civilians' in talking roles simply doesn't work, it detracts from authenticity not adds to it, especially if they are given lines out of character, such as the use of "I'm sorry" where the bloke would have sadi "Sorry, luv". There were other real clangers in the writing too.
I saw the interview with Anna Reeves, she something like she fell in love with the area when she went for a ride in a tinnie (metal boat); perhaps if she'd left behind some of her chardonnay middle class romanticism and actually got to know the 'working classness' of the locals on the Hawkesbury she'd have know how to tell their story.
I bet the locals are kicking themselves for letting her near the place given the doubts that the film implied about compromised water quality from sewerage.
One saving grace: Kerry Armstrong