MovieChat Forums > Conker: Live and Reloaded (2005) Discussion > This game sucks compared to the original...

This game sucks compared to the original one


The single player is better because of graphics, but they completely ruined the multiplayer. There are so many icons, and health bars and sh*t that you can't even see what your shooting at. In the original there is nothing so you can actually see whats going on. They also changed the controls to be like every first person shooting game, but what made the first one so good was the different controls. I would buy the new one for the single player, but i'm sticking with the n64 version for multiplayer.

reply

You got that right, plus some of the singleplayer stuff I didnt like, whos idea was it to give Conker shorts!Why does he only have one gun in "Its War" and "Enter the vertex" plus getting rid of the frying pan I didnt like and all the other stuff that you said is true, the original kicked, this one just blows.

reply

I never played Conker's Bad Fur Day, but I love the multiplayer for Live and Reloaded. But to each their own.

reply

the only thing that really pisses me off about this one is how they censored the hell out of the single player.

reply

No kidding!!!
They censored the single player far more than the original game. It makes no sense. It's awful. Only the graphics are better. The multiplayer is okay... but to Battlefield or Battlefront - ish.

I prefer the original in all regards.

reply

yer but i heard somewhere that if u beat single player mode
u unlock something that makes the game "not censored"
heard it on....gamespot i think

reply

the music was crap in this one and i miss conkers gloves.

reply

From everything I read back when this was coming out--I don't think there is an uncensored version of the game...

which is pretty ridiculous considering it's rated Mature.

reply

Any open minded persons on the this board?

Regardless of the censorship, the single player portion of the game remains true to the original. In fact, it made some gameplay adjustments to make the gun play less frustrating and the camera less aggravating. No longer do we have to hold the trigger to aim at a desired target. Jumping while holding a gun feels ever so good, as well. And no more fighting with the camera control from time to time. As for the graphics enhancement, the game truly achieves high definition gaming for the original Xbox- So due to the amount of graphical detail, game is now, more than ever, true to the movies it parodies and the humors it attempts(Try recalling the It's War level from the games. Remember the parts about the starting point and the electrified soldier, which includes the added scenes). Multiplayer, however, may stray away from the original's, but it takes advantage of Xbox-live. How can we blame it for that? If some of our acquired taste does not, for the faint of heart, favor the online gameplay, then we must not deem it as "suck or lesser than the original." We cannot state our opinions as facts, but we can show our statements with facts backing up our own arguments. Though, I for one favor the online play... but I cannot deny the fun I had with the original.

If you are wondering... Yes, I have played the original(just finished it two times last week, too!). And yes, I have played the new one(Already finished it but gona' finish it again!). Please, do not let your feeling of nostalgia fool you, gamers.

No hard feelings to those who prefer the original, for I prefer both the games... original and new.



________
"Just kill who-ever gets in yer' way. It don't matter who."

reply