MovieChat Forums > Game Over: Kasparov and the Machine (2004) Discussion > Propaganda film from a soar loser with h...

Propaganda film from a soar loser with huge ego


If u liked this one, rent the other "documentary" about the hoax of the moonlanding, you´ll love it. Enough said!

reply

No thats a bit unfair. I dont believe 9/11 was carried out by the US. I dont believe Princess Diana was murdered. I certainly dont believe the moon landings were false. Possibly unrealistic conspiracy theories are put out there to dicredit real conspiracies and cover ups.
I believe there was no official plan in an event like Deep Blue vs Kasparov. Kasparov is just paid to do the best for IBM (losers prize) whilst keeping his pride also. It is something he knows and IBM knows, but never discussed in a room. Exactly the same patterns were followed by Kramnic when he played Deep Fritz. Kramnic had to make a silly mistake to stop himself hammering the computer. A very uncharacteristic mistake, even I probably wouldnt make. Kasparov played a suicide opening in game 6, which everyone knows you dont play against a computer. Its all starnge and you cant trust anyone when huge huge money is involved. IBM would never risk losing 6-0...ever.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v86/THX-1138/too-many-happy-meals.jpg

Thx BenjaminTheBlue

reply

it's spelled "sore" not "soar" you complete douche bag

reply

Kasparov is sometime portrayed as a sore loser, but in this case i do believe there was a conspiracy against gary, why didnt the IBM team give him his rematch where they afraid??? I mean u waste so much money and effort to play gary in 97 after gary kicked there ass in 96 and u dont give him a rematch?? Isnt that shady and why didnt they give gary deep blue's log??? While deep blue did have all the recorded matches of kasparov. It was unfair and cowardly from IBM.

reply

Deep Blue studied every match Kasparov did and essentially became a Kasparov beating machine, isn't it fair for Kasparov to be able to study the computers logs and do the same? Perhaps it is the difference between studying an opponents moves and actually being able to see their brain processes? Kasparov's requests seem reasonable, and the resistance from IBM seems fishy, after all, the guiltless person has nothing to hide.

reply

[deleted]

how high did he soar?

reply

It's hard to sore like an eagle when you are surrounded by turkeys.

reply