"You can download it legally "
Why would you automatically assume that "legally" even matters to everyone?
It doesn't.
Don't confuse 'lawful' with 'legal'.
It's perfectly lawful to download (which is really just modifying magnetic polarities on YOUR OWN harddrive, and you have the right to modify anything you own to your heart's content, or even more) anything.
Corporations and governments have tried to use their greed as logic, saying it's stealing. But it's not stealing at all. Information wants to be free, and all the information exists because the Creator gave it to us, even if He gave it to us through people.
Whatever people have, whatever corporations have, is because the Universe gave it all to them FOR FREE. Every single piece and bit of information, at least publically released, belongs to ALL BEINGS IN THE UNIVERSE.
Besides, consider this.
There used to be a problem with airspace, when airplanes started becoming popular. The problem was that millions of people owned bits of airspace, because they owned land. The airplanes couldn't just freely cross that airspace, without the consent of the owner.
But it would have been impossible to go and ask every single owner of every single piece of the airspace a permission, so it was decreed that since it's impractical and impossible, they don't have to do it.
The same thing is true with information and data these days. It's impractical and impossible to "own" bits, especially if you publish them.
I mean, you can't PUBLISH something and then greedily at the same time think you can PROFIT from it. Look, you either OWN that something, and keep it locked in your desk drawer, and don't send it anywhere, _OR_ you give it freely to the Universe (who actually gave what you have to you originally freely anyway - how much did you pay for your inspiration or ideas? How much did you pay for your brain or your muscles that helped you create whatever you made? Why do you expect others to have to pay for something that YOU got for free? Sure, if you had hard work, it would be decent if you got a _REASONABLE_ compensation for it, but trying to make millions by RESTRICTING people's right to modify their own harddrive as much as they want, is just greedy, egotistical and wrong)!
Don't bring human-created MONEY system (that's just 'debt' anyway) into it! Don't bring governments, banks and corporations into it! Don't put it through all that - just give it to others for free - your Creator will take care of you, that was promised to us already thousands of years ago!
In any case, when someone says 'copying is stealing', it's like they have been completely brainwashed, and lack the logic that a 4-year already should have.
If I go to a store, and I don't have any money, and I am really hungry, and I take a banana and run away, that's stealing, BECAUSE the actual owner of that banana doesn't HAVE it any more, and did not receive a compensation for it (though Earth gave that banana for free, only humans put a price tag on it, but that can be talked about later). It's a LOSS for the store owner, it's taking someone else's property, DEPRIVING HIM OF IT.
THAT is what stealing is - depriving. You take something, which means that the end result is that that someone NO LONGER HAS IT. It's gone. You stole it.
Now, if I go to the same store, and I don't have any money, and I am really hungry, and I COPY the banana (An E.T. handed me a device that can scan anything small-ish and make a perfect copy it, without touching or harming the original, for example, if you need an explanation as to how this could be possible - I mean, this is a rhetorical device, an E.T. didn't REALLY hand me any device), ..
.. with _WHAT_ kind of twisted, feminist, fascist, corporate-greed, endlessly evil logic is that STEALING?
The store owner STILL has his banana, he doesn't even have to know about what happened, and I will have food, and everyone is happy. He can still sell the banana, and get his profit. No one was hurt. AND NOTHING WAS STOLEN.
The corporate logic goes like this, I think:
- They make some crap that no one wants
- Someone 'downloads' a 'copy' of that crap
- That someone would definitely have BOUGHT that crap, if he couldn't download it
- So they lost that 'revenue', because now they have to sell it to someone else instead!
Yeah.. that's really logical. So instead of having billions and billions of dollars of profit, the poor, sad, victim-corporations only now have billions of dollars. Oh, HOW CAN THEY STAND IT! The poor dears!
The corporate logic doesn't consider these factors:
- The market might not have been as big as they thought it would
- People are used to recording stuff on tape from radio and TV, so they might not necessarily buy it all anyway
- People do not have an endless supply of money, so even if they couldn't download the thousands of mp3s (for example) that they might have on their harddrives, it's possible that they STILL wouldn' t been able to afford all those thousands of songs
- People might not WANT to purchase the crap, even if they couldn't get it for free
- Even if people would buy and want to buy the music, and couldn't get it for free, it's possible that they might still arrange their budget very differently than what the corporate calculations show
It's like, someone might be able to afford two CDs a month. Now, he can download thousands of songs easily. But every single song is calculated as a 'loss', as if this individual would have DEFINITELY BOUGHT every single song, if he couldn't get it for free - although he can only afford two CDs a month!
Something is very, VERY wrong with the corporate calculations, as well as logic, as well as common sense (or lack thereof), as well as pragmatism. Those corporations are like big babies who cry for authority figures if they can only eat 2 liters of ice cream every day instead of 20.
When it's questionable, whether they should be eating ice cream AT ALL.
Down with those legal fictions, I rather live within the world of common sense, common law, and human beings than persons, corporations and the 'legal system'.
By the way, copying/downloading/'transferring files' is not, I repeat, is NOT "piratism". I know there is a 'pirate party' and 'pirate bay', but this is just the typical NWO-lingo that they WANT people to use.
And when the elite, the NWO-people and the corporations are the REAL pirates (more real than most would imagine, but if you research where the Nazi SS skull death cult symbol came from (the pirates), who did the original voodoo rituals with - you guessed it, Moloch to sacrifice babies to (the pirates), it's easy to piece it together to modern elitists like the bush and rockefeller family, etc. who belong to the SKULL&CROSSBONES club, and have rituals in Bohemian Crove where they sacrifice either real babies or baby effigies (not that much better, when you think about it) to a stony owl-demon called .. well, we all know)..
.. it's somehow ironic that they accuse, stigmatize and claim that people who do harmless copying (which is completely and utterly LAWFUL activity, because you don't kill, steal, harm or fraud) are somehow "pirates" and they do "pirating".
One could write a thick book about pirates and the whole skull&crossbones-symbol, that permeates all areas of life these days, from old, old comic books to the most modern movies and TV shows. That symbol is EVEN IN THIS MOVIE!
There's just no escaping that symbol - no matter how well you try to hide yourself from it, it will punch you in the face, sooner or later. I was one day taking a nice stroll, when I looked at someone's yard, and what do you know - the kids were indoctrinated into playing "pirates", and they had that symbol in a flag that was actually raised in a flagpole! There is no escaping it unless you are blind or never watch or read anything visual, or go outside.
They even sell kids' pillows with a 'cute-ish' version of that symbol! And often it has the other eye(hole) covered by an eyepatch (All-Seeing Eye thrown into the mix) or covered in some way.
It's a sick, crazy world, to the extent, that no one probably can make a FULL report on all the evils and horrible structures and forces behind every bad thing in it.. and everything is connected to something else.
So I will end this message now, otherwise I might end up typing 200 pages of text, and still feel that I have not quite covered the matter.
But my point is that copying is not piratism, it should not be called or associated with piratism in any way. It's just a way to arrange free information and data for EVERYONE - FREEDOM FOR ALL, isn't that what people have even been willing to die for (and murder for, but no one usually puts it like that for some reason)?
If everyone could have everything they need and want, wouldn't that be a definition of a paradise? Then why be against it? Because you care so much about shareholders and their slightly smaller PROFITS?
I care about the planet, about it's Creator, it's denizens (and not just humans, either), and life itself.
Which do you think is the better target for caring?
reply
share