MovieChat Forums > I Love the '70s (2003) Discussion > Has anyone ever noticed age discrepancie...

Has anyone ever noticed age discrepancies


Just for instance, Mo Rocca was born in 1969. Michael Ian Black was born in 1971. Alot of others on this show also were pre-adolescent if not close to infantile yet they talk about these things like they lived it. I mean lived it with the recollection like they were at least in high school at the time. It just kind of bugs me. Next time you catch one of the shows think about whos talkin anhow old they were at the time. Like the '71 show I watched, Michael Ian Black was just being born, Mo Rocca was 2 years old and these guys talk like they really experienced that stuff. I was 6 years old and couldnt remember alot about the show Adam-12, but these guys are naming characters in the show and what they liked about certain characters. Gimme a break. Am I the only one that has noticed this

reply

Why does this bug you so? I was born in 1985, I didn't live the whole decade of the 80's. That's where your parents come in, they expose these things to you as you get older. You used the examlpe of tv shows, well if i'm not mistaken a lot of those show's lasted about 7 to 10 seasons. Well once you get older you could start watching that show while its still on the air or in this case syndication or reruns. Did that not ever occure to you? I was born in 85 and even though I didn't live that whole decade there are a lot of things from that time I know about. Toys, movies, music, clothes, tv. My parents exposed these things to me, just like they exposed me the stuff of 70's. I know alot about decades before my time that kids my age don't know about, heck I know alot about the 70's more than my own parents which is pretty sad. You could quiz me on any deacade of the 20th century and most likely I'll give you a right answer. Now I don't know everything about these decades but I know enough. Why do you think we have TV land, Nick at Night, oldies on radio stations, and history books? Here's the thing that bugs me and can't understand is why people have such a problem with young people knowing about stuff before their time. If anything you should be happy and amazed by that, yes were in a new century and all but there's nothing wrong with knowing about other decades or even other century's. Thats why its called having a taste for knowledge, not everything is about 2006 or the new millennium. Thats why I watch these documentaries, to know more about these decades and of the three the 70's is my favorite because it seemed like a cool and fun time back then. Don't get me wrong, I also love the 80's (I'm wearing an I love the 80's shirt now), the 90's, 60's, and some things from other decades. I don't think the point of these documentaries was meant to interview people who were alive in that particular year or the whole decade. I'm not saying your dumb or anything, but maybe you should have thought twice about what you said before posting it.

reply

Hey Im not saying they couldnt eventually find out about some of that stuff, but not all of it. And the way they present it, like they were there at that time. Hey, I was born in 1966 and they blow me away with some of the stuff. I remember alot of the things they present, but only remotely. Anything before the age of ten is usually nothing more than a blur. You telling me these guys sat around all night watching Nick at Night catching up on all those old shows in their high school years and or college years. Yea right. You need to think twice and not be so naive.

reply

Well how else can you explain it? Didn't I also say that parents could expose that stuff to their kids. I think your the one who's being naive, I was using the TV Land and Nike at Night thing as examples. Those guys were actually there during the 70's, so the old reruns of shows on Nike at Night or TV Land would be for the people born in the 80's and 90's. I have favorite shows from those decades that I watch because of reruns, and if I happened to know about them so what. The whole point of these documentaries is to get peoples opinions, views, and if they happened to have been alive during that time their telling us their memories of the stuff going on back then. Oh and believe it or not people can have a clear view of things when they were under the age of 10, I have. Why is this such a big deal for you? Why is this so bothersome?

reply

well said, Dfoundec20. i watch shows, biograpies, and such so i can know about certain subject i otherwise didn't live through. history is a fun thing for me, so i'm a sucker for such media.

reply

You do realize that they use cue cards some of the time right? And they elaborate and such. They're given a brief history of what they're supposed to talk about, and then they talk about it. But for films and such it's easy, because I've seen some of the films that they speak about, and I wasn't even born in that decade. But for the different fads of the time, they were prompted about them. And for the music, they also wouldn't need to be prompted for. But for a lot of the things that you'd have to experience to understand, they're probably given cues about it.

It's not the most... genuine way to do the show, no, but I find it to be great that way. I'd rather have hilarious and witty people commenting about the decade than people who lived it, but don't quite have the personality that Mo or Michael have. You know?

"I don't like so much freedom down there. It makes me tingly in my giblets."

reply

You know, that cue card things never dawned on me. But you pretty much hit it on the nail Goofyride, and at least you knew where I was coming from.

reply

Yeah, hehe, I've got your back.

Anyway, I was watching I Love the '70s Vol. 2 and one of the comedians hinted that he was reading the wrong cue card. I always assumed. I'm thinking, "How can all of these people know exactly what to say?"..."How can all of these people sing this particular song. How do they know the whole thing?" SO yeah, I just kind of assumed that it was scripted, but not exactly scripted. A lot of them just improved on it, and that's what makes it impressive for me.

"I don't like so much freedom down there. It makes me tingly in my giblets."

reply

[deleted]

yeah, that kinda always bugged me, they had that female Band "The Donnas" and they are talking about the 1970's....thats bull
THEY WERE BORN IN 1979

how can they talk about 1972?

but whatever, its funny and i watch it but it always bugged me.

This was the exact example that I was thinking of. I was born in 1976 and I don't remember most of what they cover on these shows. I just think it's interesting because it's pop culture. Yeah, to be on a show covering the 70's and to be born in '79, please. Put them on the "I love the 90's" series. They aren't even funny...I can't believe they couldn't find somebody more interesting and relevant to the decade to be on these shows.

reply

I think they should have gotten people that literally remember it all happening.

reply

Why is it so necessary for them to have to be born before the 70's or the beginning of it. And why is their age so important to you guys anyway. This is a documentary about the different decades which is suppose to give you some insight of what went on then. Yet you all are making a fuss about some of the people on this show and the fact that they weren't born before that decade started. Give me a break people! Try watching this show and have fun learning about the different years instead of worrying about who was or was not born in whatever year.

reply

I do enjoy it, I just don't enjoy people pretending like they experienced it when they in fact did not. And like I said earlier, if you're going to get people who didn't experience it firsthand, at least make them funny or interesting (unlike The Donnas and some others).

reply

Right on movielover33...

reply

In the first series they had a lot of older people who came of age and lived the 70's. Now, they have a much younger group of people who expirienced next to nothing. This group is fine for I Love The 80's/ 90's. But in the 70's you know it's so fake.

"Enough is enough. I've had it with these snakes"
-- Neville Flynn, Snakes on a Plane

reply

You know, I never thought about that, but you're right! It does seem kinda weird that they have these people talking about stuff pretty much before their time. On the other hand, VH1 probably didn't want to bring in a whole new slew of people to do the commentaries because we're already familiar with people like Michael Ian Black and Mo Rocca (who although are not always funny, they are staples of the I Love series.)

I was born in 1978 but one of my passions is music from the 60's and 70's. I know a LOT of songs from those decades, even though I wasn't even born until the very end of the 70's. People who are older than me are always astounded at how much I know about stuff from back then because of my age. But, I would probably never go on a TV show presenting stuff from back then like I lived it. Well, unless I was getting paid a lot for it!

"I don't want FOP damn it! I'm a 'Dapper Dan Man'!"

reply

Exactly! I was born in 1976 and my favorite music is Pink Floyd, Led Zeppelin, Derik and the Dominoes, Fleetwood Mac, etc. I can tell you an awful lot about those bands, but I wouldn't go on a show talking about my memories of these bands, since my memories are not from that era.

reply

Well it's not only that, but the way they present some of their "memories" of events.

{In a reminising way} "Oh, yeah... _______, that was {great/horrible/crazy}" Even if they weren't old enough to know who the band/product/etc until almost 5-10 years later. Perhaps the reason why so many of them are so condecending about events (the show should just as well be called "I didn't quite love the {decade}, so let's be condecending about everything!" Then again, if they had actually remembered the event when it actually occured, they might shed a different light on it. I realize that many are comedians, but this is VH-1, not Comedy Central.

Ever since the "I Love..." series became "Best Year Ever" (using almost the whole cast from "Best Week Ever"), it's gone way downhill. If VH-1 actually cared about delivering a quality product, they'd fork over the money, or ask REAL celebrities who actually lived, or took part in an event (not these C-listers) to sit down and talk about the decade they lived in. If they're trying to present the show to a 18-34 year old demographic only, then they're missing the point.

"You've shown your quality sir. The very highest."

reply

Isn't the whole point of the series is to learn about what went on in these three decades. Its suppose to be for people of all ages. Is it possible that maybe they just wanted to get people to talk about their own memories or their decreption of whatever show/movie or whatever, regardless of weather they were born before, during, and after.I mean some of the stuff back then did cross over into the 80's and 90's. For example, they once showed the "Light Bright" and "Easy Bake Oven", I had both those toys and I was born in 1985. Where did it say that this show was meant just for people who lived during the 70's. It sounds like you guys are saying that the I love the 70's is the show for only those who lived it, but last I checked it was a documentary for everyone to see.

reply

I agree to a point (the show is supposed to be about 'learning' or remembering what happened in the decade they are talking about), and even as I was born in the early 80s, I really didn't remember a lot of the things they talked about until 85 or so, and that was because they were mostly still around later on. If I had a chance to be on the show, I would probably have to say I'd refuse until a point that I was *out* of diapers.

It isn't that we think it's only *for* the people of that decade, but they shouldn't have people on talking about how Woodstock 1970 turned out when they themselves were not born till 1971.

"You've shown your quality sir. The very highest."

reply

In the first one, the younger commenters were very jokey, commening on events and mentioning how young they were. Now, we have people who were born in 1974 talking about how sad they were when Jimi Hendrix died 4 years before they were born.

"Enough is enough. I've had it with these snakes"
-- Neville Flynn, Snakes on a Plane

reply

I think it is annoying also that these people talk about the events like they actually lived them rather than hearing about them second hand, after the fact. They could have stuck with older people talking about the events from first hand experience.

reply

*sigh* Look, you all have points about these guys not being there when it happened. But some of you aren't being fair, why do people have a problem with the younger generation knowing about stuff from decades that were before their time. I know half the stuff that happened in the 70's more than my parents. They lived the 70's and yet they don't remember much. Well maybe the events like the death of Jimi Hendrex. But still I learned about these things from books, I grew up with the music of the 70's,60's,80's because my parents played them all the time, so any type of music from those times kind of rubbed off on me. Sure I listen to music of my generation, but some of the time I listen to oldies music. Anyway, I also watched a lot of tv when I was a kid (still do) along with the shows of the 80's and 90's, I also watched the shows my parents grew up on why, because they were either in sydication or reuns. And like it or not, I consider them a part of my childhood. The way you say that we learned about these things or watched these shows and movies secondhand, you make it sound like a bad thing. Kind of like "oh you young people are nothing but hand-me-downs". Yes it would be surprising that we may happen to know these things, but be glad that t young people who appreciate the stuff of these past generation, because there are many people who aren't interested.

reply

Because this is not a show to inform the youth about the 70's.This is a show made to spark nostalgia. You can't be nostalgic or something you never expiriencd, hence why the commentators are much more passionate about the 80's and 90's.

"Enough is enough. I've had it with these snakes"
-- Neville Flynn, Snakes on a Plane

reply

I'm sorry, were you responding to me? If so what did that have to do with what I just posted.

reply

I was born in 1972. I still remeber alot about the 70's. Maybe its just you or something...man I really need to get to bed.


"There can be only one"

reply

Dfondec20, it's clear as day that what KCKWolverine was talking about has everything to do with what you posted.

The people present themselves as if they actually were at a particular event, or remember when something was "big", when infact they either learned about it much later in life.

I remember very little from the early to mid 80s, this is because I was born in 1983. Would I ever be on "I Love the 80s..." talking about events that I never actually knew about when I only vaguely remember the Berlin Wall falling in 1990? Of course not. This is exactly what they are doing. Would you believe Mo Rocca or Michael Ian Black talking about how terrible hearing about Apollo 13 was? I hope not. Remember, this is called "I LOVE the 70s", which brings about a certain amount of nostalga just by the title alone.

"You've shown your quality sir. The very highest."

reply

They have a show on the Discovery Time Channel called "Yearbook" for anyone who is hung up on the age thing. Most of the people on there are old enough to remember the Sixties.

And at least Mo Rocca conceded in the original 1970 episode (not the Vol. 2 version) that he "cried when the Beatles broke up because (he) was 9 months old and 9-month old babies cry." LOL…

reply

I was born in 1971 and I remember watching Adam-12 and Emergency.

I don't recall if they were in reruns when I watched them, but I certainly remember them. I don't remember THAT much about them, but I bet if I did a little research, some stuff would come back to me.

I realize you are only using Adam-12 as an example, but I think most of the stuff is legit. Then again, these guys are comedians. They make s__t up all the time.

Randolph Mantooth? What kind of name was that?

reply

I'm 16 and I know about everything they are talking about on I Love the 70's mainly because I wish I lived during the 70's and not in this *beep* time where rap and repeated beats reign supreme among teenagers. Are you saying I can't talk about things from the 70's jokingly even though I know about it and do on a daily basis?

The best part of waking up is Satan in your cup.

reply

It seems like this post ended almost two years ago, but i'm going to say something anyway. I'm 18 and I also know plenty about decades which I did not live through. However, I would never consider myself as worthy of reminiscing about these time periods on television. In the end, the information is less interesting when coming from a person who wasn't really there. Just as with other historical documentaries, I would rather here from a WWII veteran than a qualified historian. While a historian will give you accurate facts and may even be capable of making a joke or two (as on this show), the veteran is the only person who can give you an interesting first hand account of what happened to them. My parents, who were both in high school in the 70's, could not only talk about the 70's factually and make jokes about it, they could impart interesting and often funny stories about what they actually did at the time. Such as the bi-centennial in 1976, whereas people on the show could only say it was "a big excuse to party", people like my parents could actually describe what they did, which I find far more interesting. Overall, I enjoyed this series the way it was, but thought it could have been made exceedingly more interesting and personal if people who clearly remembered the time period were interviewed.

reply

Honestly, I don't think you have to remember the 70s to love the 70s. Heck, I was born in the late 80s and I still love the 70s (though not as much as I love the 60s). This show isn't "I Remember the 70s", after all; it's "I Love The 70s".

I want...I want...I WANT EVERYTHING I'VE EVER SEEN IN THE MOVIES!

reply